On the “Wannsee Protocol”

In e-mail, probably around 2004, somebody wrote:

I keep hearing that there is plenty of documented evidence supporting the holocaust. What exactly is there? Revisionists seem to believe that it all hangs on the eyewitnessess. What about the Wannsee minutes?

It’s a “document” (strangely its available in about four different versions) that doesn’t even mention extermination at all. Wilhelm Stäglich reproduced it in his book THE AUSCHWITZ MYTH. Peter Johannes Ney wrote a whole book about the document. He also wrote an article, look on www.vho.org.

The Wannsee Protocol The Wannsee Protocol

The protocol do mention ’emigration’, ‘expulsion’ and ‘evacuation’, a lot.
See:

The Chief of the Security Police and the SD then gave a short report of the struggle which has been carried on thus far against this enemy, the essential points being the following:
a) the expulsion of the Jews from every sphere of life of the German people,
b) the expulsion of the Jews from the living space of the German people.
In carrying out these efforts, an increased and planned acceleration of the emigration of the Jews from Reich territory was started, as the ONLY POSSIBLE present solution.

By order of the Reich Marshal, a Reich Central Office for Jewish Emigration was set up in January 1939 and the Chief of the Security Police and SD was entrusted with the management. Its most important tasks were
a) to make all necessary arrangements for the preparation for an increased emigration of the Jews,
b) to direct the flow of emigration,
c) to speed the procedure of emigration in each individual case.
The aim of all this was to cleanse German living space of Jews in a legal manner.

III.
Another possible solution of the problem has now taken the place of emigration, i.e. the evacuation of the Jews to the East, provided that the Führer gives the appropriate approval in advance.

These actions are, however, only to be considered provisional, but practical experience is already being collected which is of the greatest importance in relation to the future final solution of the Jewish question.
The evacuated Jews will first be sent, group by group, to so-called transit ghettos, from which they will be transported to the East.

SS-Obergruppenführer Heydrich went on to say that an important prerequisite for the evacuation as such is the exact definition of the persons involved.

It is not intended to evacuate Jews over 65 years old…

State Secretary Dr. Bühler stated that the General Government would welcome it if the final solution of this problem could be begun in the General Government, since on the one hand transportation does not play such a large role here nor would problems of labour supply hamper this action. Jews must be removed from the territory of the General Government as quickly as possible, since it is especially here that the Jew as an epidemic carrier represents an extreme danger and on the other hand is causing permanent chaos in the economic structure of the country through continued black market dealings.
…The meeting was closed with the request of the Chief of the Security Police and the SD to the participants that they afford him appropriate support during the carrying out of the tasks involved in the solution.

Also see this, from Chapter 8 of Holocaust or Hoax?:

a) The Wannsee Protocol

For decades, it was claimed that the extermination of the Jews was decided at the Wannsee Conference in Berlin of 20 January 1942. Anyone who reads the (alleged) protocol of that conference (17), will discover that it contains no mention of any physical extermination of the Jews, nothing about gas chambers, and speaks only of “evacuation” and “resettlement”. The orthodox historians, as usual, offer the lazy excuse that these are code words for extermination.

Even if this document were genuine, it would in no way constitute proof for any extermination of the Jews, but rather for their deportation, which is not disputed by any revisionist. But the Wannsee Protocol is a rather crude forgery, as shown by several revisionist researchers, in greatest detail by Johannes P. Ney (18). The forgery is proven by absurdities of content (for example grossly exaggerated numbers of Jews living in Europe), as well as formal errors.

30 copies of the Wannsee Protocol are supposed to have been prepared. Of these 30 copies, only 1, the 16th, has survived, quite remarkably, in several different versions, in which SS is written sometimes in runes, and sometimes in normal script.

Even the exterminationists are distancing themselves further and further from the Wannsee protocol. In the Canadian Jewish News of 20 January 1992, Israeli Holocaust Specialist Yehuda Bauer, calls the belief that the conference arrived at any decision to exterminate the Jews, a “silly story”. According to him, the whole caste of historians just blabbered a silly story for decades, like parrots. The “silly story” also appears in all schoolbooks.

Source

HOLOCAUST HISTORY ARCHIVE by k0nsl in DEBUNKINGS/CORRESPONDENCE/EMAILS.

One Comment

  1. whoah this blog is wonderful i love rreading your articles.
    Keep up tthe good work! You understand, lots of individuals are
    hunting round for this information, you could help them greatly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *