PATRIOT LETTER: THE YOUNG AND BRAINWASHED — LADY MICHELE RENOUF — ADELAIDE INSTITUTE — AND MORE

Patriot Letter. Dated 3/23/05.

Archived by k0nsl.

[NOTE: if there are formatting issues in any of the newsletters archived by me that’s because the original had these issues too and if I encounter something that’s totally messed up I’ll fix it. But minor issues will be left alone.]

Dear Fellow Patriot!

 

Zundel In Germany:

http://www.adelaideinstitute.org

For Zundel updates please visit the above website!

To submit news, information, etc. about Ernst Zundel,
please e-mail

info@adelaideinstitute.org

 

Before I start, let’s do some house cleaning:

Hurray! Dr. Nordbruch’s books “Der Deutsche Aderlass”
have arrived! We have worked overtime here in the
Community News War Room to get them in the mail
tomorrow.

It seems that the first shipment has disappeared. It
couldn’t have been the German authorities, since the
book is exclusively talking about Allied atrocities.
It is my guess that, since we have a Homeland Security
Agent in every main post office here, it somehow
displeased them. Anyway, thank you so much for your
patience!

Community News is back from the printer and it is yet
another incredible issue.

“The Fuehrer’s Aircraft Squadron and its Commander”
occupies the front-page with very rate pictures of
Flying Captain Baur. Max Schmeling and of course Ernst
Zundel’s deportation to Germany are featured as well.
Die Deutsche  Ecke” and Richard Warren’s A More
Perfect Union are also continued.

For a complimentary copy, please e-mail.

*******************************************************

THE YOUNG AND THE BRAINWASHED

By Walter F. Mueller

Red Lake, Minnesota: A teenage tribal boy from the Red
Lake Indian Reservation walked into his high-school,
after he killed his grandparents, and killed seven
people and then himself.

“Wiese enjoyed Marilyn Manson music and had expressed
his admiration for Adolf Hitler,”

writes the press! Germany’s “Der Spiegel” blames the
entire rampage and the boy’s idolization of the
Fuehrer.

I know, it shouldn’t surprise me, but it still does.
All the evil in the world is blamed on Adolf Hitler.

However, the truth is that it isn’t the great German
statesman that is to be blamed, but the Jews for the
constant demonizing of Adolf Hitler and anything
related to the Third Reich. Imagine, almost 70 years
and they have turned Adolf Hitler into Satan. I don’t
even think that Satan has as bad a reputation than the
Fuehrer.

Young Wiese has chosen Adolf Hitler because the
traditional enemy keeps propagandizing him constantly.
What the young man didn’t know was that it is all a
lie. That during Hitler’s reign, school shootings were
out of question. There hasn’t been a leader yet that
has attracted the support of young people as Adolf
Hitler did. Young people like Wiese didn’t exist in
“Adolf Hitler’s Dictatorship.”

The youth of Germany during the reign of Adolf Hitler
was a strong and principled one.

In the U.S., school campuses looked like a sci-fi
scene. Multi-culturism has completely corrupted the
character of the young people in this country.
Competition is bad, being the best is bigoted, and
having good grades is racism.

No one is to blame for these school shootings then the
policy of the U.S. Government. This stuff would not
have been possible during the Third Reich.

Rebellion against authority has been around for as
long as human kind existed. I always thought it is a
good thing for young people to question everything.
However, today, the Jewish owned media offers the
young mind a smorgasbord of choices: Adolf Hitler, SS,
Nazis, Saddam Hussein, Arabs, Muslims, etc. Rebellion
today means being bad because they are portrayed of
being bad. You can’t single out just the young white
youth. Any youth in the U.S. faces the same peer
pressure. The black kids can’t live without the
celebrity dream, while the Hispanics all want to be
soccer players, and the white kids can’t believe that
they are being blamed for everything.

If I was one of the parents whose kids got killed in
Minnesota, I would be suing the media for making
“evil” so popular.

More than 60 years of brainwashing is taking its toll.
All the things that the world accuses Adolf Hitler of
have been around for ages, and are still being
practiced today. Concentration camps were an invention
of the Brits. In the U.S. they were turned into
internment camps and today it’s called Guantanamo Bay.
Isolating the enemy of the state – a common practice.
A “threat to national security” is the new definition
for the war on terrorism.

Those who have painted the lies about Adolf Hitler are
a hundreds times worse than the Fuehrer could have
ever been. One of the more significant examples is
Hitler’s fight against Communism and the American’s
alignment with the Russians to defeat Adolf Hitler,
only to turn around a few years later and to declare
Communism the threat of world peace.

I received an e-mail the other day from a Diane
Murphy, telling me that my writings make me “a traitor
to her country. I am pretty sure, if she would have a
say-so, hundreds of Internment camps would be built to
put people like me in it. You get my point?

The Minnesota school rampage is again laced with the
“darkness” and “evil” of Adolf Hitler, never mind that
there isn’t a shred of truth in this. However, ask
yourself the question: Why is it that if Adolf Hitler
was this evil, school rampages didn’t exist under his
reign?

School rampages are the sign of a failed educational
policy and the inability of the parent to provide role
models. The complete brainwashing and the forced
holocaust education have turned the young people into
ticking time bombs.

Adolf Hitler made Germany’s youth a first priority and
protected them at all cost. The U.S. has made it’s
young people a very low priority and uses educational
money to support Israel. Wiese is a direct product of
the direct influence of the Jews.

*******************************************************

Speaking of rampages, Washington released the latest
numbers on illegal immigration on Monday. It has
reached an all-time high. The study estimates that
nearly 11 million illegals reside in the U.S. 9
million of them in California. The majority of
illegals come from Mexico: 57% and 24% from other
Latin American countries. It is estimated that 485,000
illegals enter the U.S. every year. Of course, these
are only the numbers they know. But, who cares – as
long as the American people believe in an imaginary
holocaust.

*******************************************************

From Lady Michele Renouf:

[START]

Walter, perhaps you have already reprinted this piece
but if not you may like to consider it for I think it
just up your street!  All best in haste, Michele

There Was No Need For World War II
By Alex S. Perry, Jr
Feb. 23, 2005

http://www.rense.com/general63/ride.htm

There was no need for World War II. Adolf Hitler was
doing everything he could to come to peace terms with
Britain, but Winston Churchill would not have it.
Churchill knew of the many peace offers coming from
the German government. He knew that neither Hitler nor
any other Nazi leaders wanted to fight Britain.

Winston Churchill wrote to Josef Stalin on January 24,
1944, to tell him that Britain was going to continue
the fight to the complete destruction of Germany no
matter what. He should have been more exact and said
that Britain was going to stay in the war as long as
the United States was willing to do most of the
fighting and all of the financing. Churchill’s letter
read, in part:

We never thought of peace, not even in that year when
we were completely isolated and could have made peace
without serious detriment to the British empire, and
extensively at your cost. Why should we think of it
now when victory approaches for the three of us?1

What Churchill meant by “when we were completely
isolated” was the time before Russia and the United
States became involved. Churchill kept the war going
for a purpose. Britain at this time was so weak that
Germany could have smashed her within a few weeks. Had
Hitler been the kind of man history says he was and
had he captured the British army at Dunkirk, which he
could easily have done and should have done, he could
have written the peace ticket without invading
Britain. Churchill’s worried son Randolph asked
Churchill a few days after he became the prime
minister how could he expect to win this war.
Churchill replied, “I shall drag the United States
in.”2

And so he did, and he knew he could. And how did he do
it? He could not have dragged the United States in had
Franklin Roosevelt not wanted to be dragged in, in the
first place. He did it by not giving up-that is, by
not accepting the peace terms Germany was offering.
Roosevelt’s great fear was that the war would be over
before America could get in. FDR wanted to go down in
history as a wartime president. Roosevelt and
Churchill were in secret communication before
Churchill became prime minister. This is the reason
why Tyler Kent, who worked in the code room in the
American Embassy in London beginning in 1939, was
thrown in prison as soon as Churchill took office.
Kent was sentenced not for anything criminal, but
because of what he knew. Roosevelt would not rescue
this American citizen from Churchill’s clutches
because Kent had proof that FDR was promising the
British leader that he would eventually come into the
war. Churchill records a conversation he and Harry
Hopkins had on January 10, 1941:

The president is determined that we shall win the war
together. Make no mistake about it. He has sent me
here to tell you that at all costs and by all means he
will carry you through, no matter what happens to him.
There is nothing that he will not do, so far as he has
human power.3

Churchill became prime minister on May 10, 1941. When
the Germans captured Poland, they found in the Polish
archives the evidence about the part FDR played in
getting the fuse of World War II lit. These Polish
records were transported to Berlin for safekeeping,
and when Germany fell to the Allies, they were shipped
to Washington, where they were kept under lock and key
for about 20 years so that no one could see them.

David Irving reports in Hitler’s War what these
documents say:

A different aspect of Roosevelt’s policy was revealed
by the Polish documents ransacked by the Nazis from
the archives of the ruined foreign ministry buildings
in Warsaw. The dispatches of the Polish ambassadors in
Washington and Paris laid bare Roosevelt’s efforts to
goad France and Britain into war with Germany while he
rearmed the United States and psychologically prepared
the American public for war. . . . in spring of 1939,
[Ambassador William C.] Bullitt quoted Roosevelt as
being determined “not to participate in the war from
the start, but to be in at the finish.” . . . The
Warsaw document left little doubt as to what had
stiffened Polish resistance during the August 1939
crisis.

Irving quotes Baron von Weizaecker as saying that
Hitler “had set his heart on peace” and Hitler as
saying “The survival of the British empire is in
Germany’s interest too.” Hitler “felt he had
repeatedly extended the hand of peace and friendship
to the British, and each time they had blackened his
eye in reply.”4

Prof. G.C. Tansill’s Back Door to War, Chap. XXIII,
states that it was Roosevelt, above all others, who
was working unceasingly for war. Tansill cites
evidence to show that Roosevelt was using every
channel at his disposal to encourage Chamberlain to go
to war with Germany. Roosevelt was telling Britain and
France that he would come to their aid at once should
they go to war against the Germans. Ambassador Joseph
P. Kennedy was repeatedly telling Chamberlain that
America would rush to the assistance of Britain and
France in the event of unprovoked aggression, and
Bullitt was encouraging France to believe the same
thing.5

Likewise Eleanor Roosevelt reveals that her husband
was not surprised nor upset, although he allowed the
public to draw the impression that he was, with the
attack on Pearl Harbor. The disaster at Pearl “was a
great fulfillment” as far as Roosevelt’s worry over
the matter was involved, and Mrs. Roosevelt “tells us
that he was more ‘serene’ than he had been for a long
time.”6

Hitler’s mistake in not capturing Britain right away
was based on his belief that he was in contact with a
strong peace movement in England. The peace movement
was controlled by Churchill, but Hitler did not know
this. All the German letters and messages sent to the
peace movement were intercepted by the British
government. Rudolf Hess was invited to come to Britain
by this fake peace movement to discuss and make plans
for peace. The sole purpose for this deception of the
Germans was to delay the end of the war with Germany
until the United States could involve itself.

The peace offer Hitler had in mind, if Britain would
assume a neutral position, was such an astounding
offer that Herbert Hoover, when he was told of
Hitler’s terms from Ambassador Kennedy, gasped: “Why
didn’t the British accept?” “Nothing but Churchill’s
bullheadedness,” replied Kennedy.7 Kennedy’s statement
was enough to condemn Churchill as a war criminal.

At the height of Hitler’s power, the German chancellor
offered to withdraw from France, Denmark and Norway.8
He proposed to roll back his army without a shot being
fired. He would make peace with England even if
England would not agree to return the German colonies,
which Britain had taken from Germany at the end of
World War I.9

Hitler did not want war. He was so against war that he
said it would not do Germany any good, even if Germany
won the war, as war would put an end to all his plans.
“Hitler was not thinking of war,” Albert Forster,
36-year-old district leader of Danzig, told Churchill,
as “the Führer’s immense social and cultural plans
would take years to fulfill.”10

Hitler expressed this opinion: “A European war would
be the end of all our efforts even if we should win,
because the disappearance of the British empire would
be a misfortune which could not be made up again.”11
He told the Dutch fascist leader Anton Mussert: “We
have not the slightest reason to fight Britain. Even
if we win, we gain nothing.”12 Hitler was such an
admirer of the British empire that he offered to
defend the empire anywhere in the world with German
troops should Britain ever need them.13

Hitler did not want to take over the world. This idea
is British propaganda. Churchill and Roosevelt wanted
war, and they forced it on Germany. Hitler did all he
could to be friendly with Britain and France.

The duke of Windsor thought, in July 1940, that the
war was allowed to go on only because certain British
politicians and statesmen-if they can be called
anything that sounds so dignified-had to have a reason
to save their faces, even if this meant that the
British empire would be bankrupted and shattered.14

Churchill and Roosevelt knew what was going on.
Churchill bragged that “War is a game that has to be
played with a smiling face.”15 Surely, they must have
thought the tricks they were playing on their own
countries and the world as something funny. But at the
same time, millions of British and American soldiers
and civilians were persuaded to look upon this war as
something serious. They had no choice.

Misleading the public is truly the mark of a cynical
politician and the dishonest news media, in time of
war as well as at other times. These two men,
Roosevelt and Churchill, instead of saving the world
from some great evil, as Tom Brokaw maintains,
multiplied the evils the world had to face.

One of the meanest tricks Churchill played on the Ger
mans was the trick he played on Hess. On May 10, 1941,
Hitler’s right-hand man flew alone to the duke of
Hamilton’s estate in Scotland. He expected to land at
an airfield nearby. But when he got there, he could
not find the airfield and had to bail out. Not knowing
how to do this, he had great trouble getting out of
the plane. Finally, he turned the plane over and fell
out. It was Hess’s first time to use a parachute. Hess
was expecting to be received with dignity. Instead, he
was seized, thrown into prison and held incommunicado
the rest of his life. He was charged with “crimes
against peace” at Nuremberg and sentenced to life
imprisonment. The last 20 years of his life, he was
held in solitary confinement and not allowed to see
his wife or son. Hess was given the heaviest sentence
possible-a sentence worse than death.

Hess’s flight to Britain was done in the hope that he
could convince the British government to make peace
with Germany. Because of Hess’s efforts to bring peace
to Europe, he became truly a “prisoner of peace.”

The old saw, “All’s fair in war,” can never be applied
to Hess. The treatment he received from the Allies
from May 10, 1941, until the day he died was a
crime.16 Hess would not have made his flight to
Britain had not he and Hitler, in their anxiousness
for peace, been fooled into believing that they were
in contact with a strong peace party in Britain. There
had been a strong peace party in Britain at one time,
but most of its members had been thrown in jail by
Churchill’s administration, and the rest could not
express themselves.

Churchill had, so he told his secretary in a
discussion about British aid to Russia, “only one
purpose: the destruction of Hitler. And my life is
much simplified thereby.”17

It would have been much easier and less costly in
lives and materials, not only for the British but also
for the Germans and Americans, to have encouraged the
Germans to eliminate Hitler instead of trying to
eliminate both the Germans and Hitler. “Unconditional
surrender” sounds melodic, inspiring and dramatic. But
this is all the value it had. It led the people in the
Allied nations to think the Germans would never give
up until they were totally demolished. It prolonged
the war and made it even more bitter.

There is a hint that Hitler would have volunteered to
retire had his retirement meant that Britain would
have assumed a friendly attitude toward Germany. “Days
before the beer hall bomb [Munich, November 8, 1939]
there was a hint that [Hitler] was prepared to go very
far, indeed. Ger man Prince Max Hohenlohe had spoken
in Switzerland with representatives of Vansittart,
secretary of the British Foreign Office, returning to
Germany to report to Göring that peace with England
was possible, but only with Hitler and Ribbentrop
removed from power. One observer recorded in his diary
that Göring replied that Hitler would agree to
this.”18

Mary Ball Martinez’s Pope Pius XII During the Second
World War states:

To their astonishment, the four Jesuit historians came
upon records documenting the personal involvement of
Pius XII in a plot to overthrow Hitler. In January
1940, he was approached by the agent of a certain
clique of German generals, who asked him to tell the
British government that they would undertake to
“remove” Hitler if they were given assurances that the
British would come to terms with a moderate German
regime. Pius XII promptly passed along this message to
Sir D’Arcy Osborne, Britain’s envoy to the Holy See.
The offer was turned down.19

However, on a number of occasions the Germans had
offered to remove Hitler from power if they were given
reasonable peace terms for doing so. Joseph E. Davies,
at a town hall meeting in Los Angeles, January 20,
1943, disclosed that the Germans had offered to retire
Hitler in 1940 if the British would make peace with
Germany.20 If the Germans could get rid of Hitler
anytime they desired, then Hitler’s “total dictatorial
control” over Germany was not so total and not so
dictatorial as believers in the war propaganda think,
and the Germans were not his robotic slaves.

Hans Kohn reviewed John Scott’s Duel for Europe in the
December 14, 1942 New Republic (799). He stated, “If
Britain had wished to make peace with Ger many, she
could have done it easily in 1939, in the summer of
1940, and again in the spring of 1941.” It was not
Hitler and Germany who could be described accurately
as the war maniacs. The war maniacs were Roosevelt and
Churchill and their backers, such as Bernard Baruch
and Samuel Untermeyer.

One of the reasons used to justify the destruction of
the Nazi system was that Hitler was a dictator. It was
assumed that the Germans could not get rid of him. But
why should the happiest people in the world, as David
Lloyd George spoke of the Germans after Hitler came to
power, want to dispose of their leader? The
“unconditional surrender” declaration should dispel
all thought about Hitler being in absolute command of
everything in Germany. It was not the Germans who were
forcing Hitler upon themselves. Roosevelt and
Churchill were doing it for them, and for the sole
purpose of keeping the war going as long as possible.

How did Hitler become the German leader? British
history professor A.J.P. Taylor gives the answer in
The Origins of the Second World War:

Hitler was appointed chancellor by President
Hindenburg in a strictly constitutional way and for
solidly democratic reasons.21

Conservative politicians led by Papen . . .
recommended him to Hindenburg [and] kept the key posts
for themselves.22

He did not “seize” power. He waited for it to be
thrust upon him by the men who had previously tried to
keep him out. In January 1933, Papen and Hindenburg
were imploring him to become chancellor, and he
graciously consented.23

Germany never threatened Britain. Hitler had always
wanted to be a good neighbor and a good friend to the
British. As late as January 29, 1942, after Britain
had been at war with Germany for two years and five
months, Hitler expressed a desire to help the British
by sending them 20 divisions to aid them in throwing
the Japanese invaders out of Singapore.24 He bent over
backwards in showing his earnestness and generosity.
He never would have gone to war against the British if
the British had not attacked Ger many, or, as
Churchill blazoned, “We entered the war of our free
will, without ourselves being directly assaulted.”25

Churchill was not elected-as Hitler was in Germany-to
be the prime minister by the British people. Churchill
was put in power by the “powers behind the scenes” for
the sole purpose of keeping the war going. Churchill’s
job was not to make peace but to make war.

In August 1941, Roosevelt and Churchill hypocritically
said in the third point of the Atlantic Charter that
they respected “the right of all peoples to choose the
form of government under which they will live.” Unless
the words “all peoples” do not mean what they say,
then this article clearly applies as much to the
Germans as to anyone else.

As soon as the tide of battle began to favor the
British empire, Churchill threw off the pretended
cloak of righteousness and became openly arrogant. He
said in Parliament on September 2, 1943:

The twin roots of all our evils, Nazi tyranny and
Prussian militarism, must be extirpated. Until this is
achieved, there are no sacrifices we will not make and
no lengths in violence to which we will not go.26

Of this Nazi tyranny and Churchill’s eager desire to
get rid of it, it should be pointed out that the
Germans were not oppressing the British people and if
the Germans wanted to live under their “tyrannical”
form of government, it was none of Britain’s business.
The Atlantic Charter gave the Germans this right.
Churchill did not object to Soviet tyranny, for he
hailed Russia as a welcome ally when she came into the
war.

So it turns out the democracies were at war with Ger
many to force Germany to set up a democratic form of
government, even though Hitler had been democratically
elected and Churchill had not.

The sixth point in the Atlantic Charter called for the
“destruction of Nazi tyranny” only and no other
tyranny. Therefore, according to the charter, other
tyrannies could live, thrive and be supported. It may
be noted that the sixth point contradicts the third
point. The sixth point was the same as a “secret”
declaration of war against Germany. There fore, the
United States was really in the war against Germany
long before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Hitler’s
declaration of war against the United States was made
to keep his promise to Japan and to set things
straight in the world as they really were. This
declaration made it legal for the German navy to shoot
back at the American ships in the Atlantic.

Roosevelt ordered, in April 1941, American warships to
seek out and follow German ships and to radio their
locations every four hours so British warships could
come and open an attack. Roosevelt commanded American
warships to “shoot on sight” at German submarines on
September 11, 1941.27

Adm. Stark, chief of naval operations, wrote Adm. Hart
on November 7, 1941,: “The Navy is already in the War
of the Atlantic, but the country doesn’t seem to
realize it. Apathy, to the opposition, is evident in a
considerable section of the press. Whether the country
knows it or not, we are at war.”28

All this was in flagrant defiance of Roosevelt’s
promise to Americans that we would not enter any war
unless we were attacked. These orders made America an
aggressor nation. American leaders, with their
pretended righteousness, failed in their efforts to be
the first “victims,” but this did not prevent them
from pretending to be, and the nation from believing
they were. American leaders were the victimizers, in
many ways.

The war in the Pacific was also kept going much longer
than necessary. Before the Germans were allowed to
“surrender” and before the atom bombs were dropped,
the Japanese were asking for peace. Gen. Douglas
McArthur recommended negotiations on the basis of the
Japanese overtures. But FDR brushed off this
suggestion with the remark: “McArthur is our greatest
general and our poorest politician.”29 This is the
answer in a nutshell to why the war was allowed to go
on and on, when it could have been over any day from
1943 on. It did not even have to have started in the
first place, except that FDR wanted it to start.

Clare Booth Luce said at the Republican Party
Convention in 1944 that Roosevelt “lied us into the
war.” To get America into the war, FDR provoked the
Japanese to attack. At the same time, American boys
were battling to end World War II, leading American
politicians were doing all they could for political
reasons to continue the conflict.

President Harry Truman, in early May 1945, informed
Herbert Hoover “of the extensive Japanese peace offers
and admitted then that further fighting with the
Japanese was really unnecessary. But Truman also
disclosed to Hoover that he did not feel strong enough
to challenge Secretary Stimson and the Pentagon.”

FOOTNOTES:

1 Walendy, Udo, The Methods of Reeducation, 3.

2 Kilzer, Louis C., Churchill’s Deception, 20.

3 Churchill, Winston, The Grand Alliance, 23.

4 Irving, David, Hitler’s War, 35.

5 Tansill, G.C., Back Door to War, 450-51.

6 Crocker, George Crocker, Roosevelt’s Road to Russia,
81.

7 Irving, ibid., 418.

8 Kilzer, ibid., 69-70.

9 Kilzer, ibid., 221.

10 Irving, ibid., 121.

11 McLaughlin, Michael, For Those Who Cannot Speak,
10.

12 Irving, ibid., 511.

13 Barnes, Harry Elmer, Perpetual War for Perpetual
Peace, 162; and Irving, ibid., 371.

14 Irving, ibid., xvi.

15 Walendy, ibid., 3.

16 The Barnes Review, July/August 2001.

17 Churchill, ibid., 370.

18 Kilzer, ibid., 183.

19 Journal of Historical Review, Sept./Oct. 1993, 27.

20 Leese, Arnold, The Jewish War of Survival, 20.

21 Ibid., 97.

22 Ibid., 79.

23 Ibid., 101

24 Irving, ibid., 371.

25 Martin, James J., The Saga of Hog Island, 42.

26 Grenfell, Capt. Russell, Unconditional Hatred, 92.

27 Barnes, ibid., 487.

28 Tansill, ibid., 645.

29 Chamberlin, William Henry, America’s Second
Crusade, 219.

[END]

*******************************************************

From Adelaide Institute:

http://www.adelaideinstitute.org

[START]

“WHERE’S THE FUCKING SONG, ASSHOLE?!”

From: John Kaminski

The corpse of American culture

Where all the heroes are fake and the icons are
revered for their lies

By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net

My secret is herein revealed — I’m an old sportswriter
who has been playing the same game for nigh on half a
century.

In this Internet incarnation, my subject matter has
changed considerably, though the general purpose of my
writing really has not. It has always been my
intention to get people to reflect on the folly of the
their own behavior, and these are lessons that can
always be drawn against any background.

My first bylined newspaper story hit the streets in
1957. It was about my grammar school baseball team.
Not so ironic that this my latest effort should be
partly about the same game, beloved baseball, which I
once, in my eagerly optimistic youth, regarded as a
ritual of cosmic significance.

Now, at a time when shuffleboard would probably be the
more appropriate game for me, I realize that baseball
may not be the Zen-like avenue of transcendence I once
imagined it to be, but it nevertheless is an
appropriate sociological barometer of this pathetic
hoax that is American popular culture.

So I thought when I watched canonized slugger Mark
McGwire testify recently before a Congressional panel
investigating the use of steroid drugs in professional
baseball. His voice crackled. Tears welled in the
corners his eyes. It soon became obvious that here was
a man who had reaped the highest adulation of the
unwashed masses and now was about to commit the public
suicide of his glorious reputation.

“Based on what my lawyer tells me, I cannot talk about
my past history,” McGwire told the puzzled committee.
Rep. Charles Lewis asked for a clarification. “Does
this mean you’re taking the Fifth?” the Congressman
asked. McGwire squirmed in his seat. His squeezed
throat quested for air as he uncomfortably nodded his
assent … and watched his lifetime achievements
evaporate in a puff of guilt-ridden smoke.

The refusal to answer meant the great slugger had
cheated and couldn’t talk about it. He had used
chemical substances to improve his physical
performance, which helped him break baseball’s most
hallowed record, the single season home run mark.

It was perhaps the most shattering moment in baseball
history, equaled only by hit king Pete Rose’s lifetime
ban for gambling and the 1919 Black Sox scandal, after
which eight players were banned for life for fixing
the World Series.

But McGwire’s case, devastating as it was to his own
previously hallowed reputation, was even more ominous
in the future revelations it foreshadowed —
specifically, the implication of fellow slugger Barry
Bonds in the same seamy and dishonest practice of
boosting one’s performance with drugs. And with the
future of Bonds, a seven-time most valuable player and
the dominant icon in the game today, soon expected to
take a similar turn to the bleak, McGwire’s silent
self-destruction seemed to augur the impending
destruction of America’s national pastime itself.

Another nail in the coffin of a contrived and
superficial culture.

In my mind, I tried to contemplate a comparative
demoralization in the history of American culture, and
all I could come up with was when U.S. troops had to
bail out of Saigon by helicopter definitely with their
tails between their legs.

Egotistical America had finally lost a war, and
Americans didn’t know what to make of it. It turned
out we didn’t learn our lesson.

Of course, comparing the relatively trivial issue of
an ultimately meaningless form of entertainment to a
major conflagration in which almost four million
people lost their lives is a dubious example. But it’s
safe to say that a larger number of Americans care
about baseball than care about the lives of innocent
foreigners its Army arbitrarily snuffs out.

So in the sense of the debauched and misplaced
American social focus, the two events actually are
comparable.

But the collective American psyche is not likely learn
the lesson in this new baseball tragedy, either.

That lesson would be that cheating and not competing
fairly always catches up to the cheater, even if the
scam undertaken seems undetectable at the outset of
the attempt.

The comparison to the new fascist American government
storming around the world and obliterating all who
oppose is an obvious similarity. We all may only pray
that this Pentagon adventurism comes to a similarly
ignominious end.

But I wanted to linger a little longer on the
entertainment level in an attempt to show how
robotized and thoughtless America has become, because
when you talk politics these days, most Americans just
shut down and polarize along the border between
compassionate consciousness and mindless dogma.

Toronto Sun columnist Eric Margolis used one of my
favorite examples the other day to demonstrate the
decline of American awareness (and intelligence and
compassion) when he wrote about the ’60s movie “Seven
Days in May,” which was based on a bestselling novel
written around the time of the Cuban missile crisis
and worldwide fears of a nuclear war.

In that black-and-white classic, Burt Lancaster plays
the demonic General Scott, a right-wing lunatic who is
frustrated by the humane agenda of a liberal
president, played by Frederic March. Kirk Douglas
plays the role of the hero, a subordinate of the
demented general who alerts the well-meaning president
about the coup that is about to take place, and the
plot is foiled.

But the salient feature of the movie is Lancaster’s
(the general’s) behavior. He is a classic Patriot,
focused on enemies and without compassion or
understanding. Even more astounding from the
perspective of forty years later is that he sounds
exactly like our current criminal president, George W.
Bush.

In the early 1960s, Lancaster’s role was excoriated by
both reviewers and audiences for its over-the-top
portrayal of an obviously compulsive maniac. Yet
today, President Bush’s virtually identical
performance is depicted by today’s prostituted media
as a legitimate leader with valid religious
convictions.

I find this observation to be a perfect description of
the difference between the conscious culture of the
1960s and the comatose culture of the first decade of
the 21st century, as well as a confirmation of the
trend in American movies that principled heroism is no
longer a trait to be practiced.

Through its movies, America has descended into a sewer
of viciousness.

Speculating on how this pathological and regrettable
degeneration of American culture occurred leads
inevitably to the question of who owns both the media
and the educational processes that led to this
diminution of consciousness, this decommissioning of
traditional moral boundaries, this death of the
American good guy.

Who owns the process that has destroyed the America we
hoped to love, the America for whom we now feel only
contempt, mistrust and fear? Do you care enough about
the answer to find out, or are you OK with the idea
that both your livelihood and your life are about to
be destroyed? Let me know your answer at some later
date, if you care enough to answer at all.

And let me sketch just one more example of the
degeneration of American culture, this drug-induced
deflation of a once-honest populace, this bogus,
superficial patriotism that has been converted by
insincere jingoism into a murderous, emotionalism
fascism that now threatens to turn the whole planet
into a radioactive cinder.

It’s the music. In case you haven’t noticed, it’s
dead.

As popular culture of the Sixties mobilized to oppose
the senseless war in Vietnam, numerous popular artists
earned vast followings by standing up to the
government’s sadistic slaughter of those who were
called “gooks.”

Recently, I listened one of the many antiwar mantras
that dominated the airwaves in about 1970. “Ohio,” by
Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, was about the National
Guard murders of four antiwar students at Kent State.

“Tin soldiers and Nixon coming.
We’re finally on our own.
This summer I hear the drumming.
Four dead in Ohio.

Gotta get down to it.
Soldiers are cutting us down.
Shoulda been done long ago.
What if you knew her
and found her dead on the ground?
How can you run when you know?”

When I listened to this shortly after September 11,
2001, it seemed pretty inconsequential compared to
what had just happened? But at least the attempt was
there, the attempt to inform the world that something
was wrong.

What I want to know is this?

Where are the songs about the World Trade Center, the
greatest crime in American history, in which our own
government staged a fake terrorist attack and killed
three thousand of our own citizens?

Not a peep on the radio. After three years, not even a
single syllable.

Where are the songs about Fallujah that could rival
Gil Scot-Heron’s great classic “Johannesburg,” a
riveting lament about the black fight for freedom
against the oppression in South Africa?

Fallujah. The place braindead American zombies gunned
down old people and children to the smiles of their
superiors, and American newspapers covered it up.
Covered up the gas, covered up the napalm, the
destruction of hospitals, the prevention of medical
care, then covered up the soldiers going back in and
destroying the evidence that they used gas and napalm,
and God knows what else.

What I want to say is this?

WHERE’S THE FUCKING SONG, ASSHOLE?!

And I’d like to address that question to every
musician in America, in the world. I’d especially like
to ask it of so-called legendary icons like Bruce
Springsteen and Bonnie Raitt, Bob Dylan (you
nihilistic twit!) and Eric Clapton (you simpering
wimp!), Eminem (don’t fall for that Democratic crap)
and Doctor Dre (abandon your mansion and step up
now!).

The whole music scene, and all the retards who think
they’re cool by following it, are nothing but robotic
moral cowards who have abdicated their responsibility
to the world. Who will have the courage to step
forward, like all these brave folks in the 9/11
skeptics movement have done?

And when you try to escape into the pleasing
triviality of sports, and confront the reality that
baseball’s two greatest sluggers have both cheated to
achieve their accomplishments, you should get some
depressing inkling that the whole enterprise is a lie
meant to distract you from the even more unpleasant
fact that your government, through its controlled
media apparatus, has stolen your life, fed you with
falsehoods, and deliberately murdered your children
with poisoned food, toxic drugs, and phony wars.

So I think it’s time you checked the scoreboard, and
find out what the score really is.

America is dead, and the international bankers are
getting ready to pick its carcass. Anybody still
walking around is now a willing zombie waving that
flag of mass murder and injustice, the Stars and
Stripes.

But hey, it’s the perfect cloth to drape over your
coffin, although no photographs will be allowed. And
hey, what’s that sound, everybody look what’s going
round … due to the condition of both the corpse and
the culture, why, that sound is the out-of-control
ticking of a Geiger counter, which may be the real
song about Fallujah that nobody apparently has the
guts to write.

John Kaminski’s Internet essays can be seen on
hundreds of websites around the world. They have been
collected into two anthologies, the latest of which is
titled “The Perfect Enemy,” about how the
Zionist-controlled U.S. government created the
terrorist group known as al-Qaeda. His booklet “The
Day America Died: Why You Shouldn’t Believe the
Official Story of What Happened on September 11, 2001”
was written especially for those who cling to the
government’s false explanation of the events of that
tragic day. For more information go to
http://www.johnkaminski.com/

[END]

*******************************************************

Dr. Leon Bourke:

[START]

Dear Walter:

Tell Mr. Worden that there is not such thing as a UN
Peace Keeper. All that the Un does is to spread the
errors of Russia which is Communism (now under another
name) Read Griffin’s THE FEARFUL MASTERS  and he will
find out how much “peace” UN peace keepers keep!!!

Sincerely
Leon Bourke

[END]

*******************************************************

Mike Reisch:

[START]

Dear Walter:

This may come as a shock to Christian Zionists in
America, but according to this Australian rabbi,
Christians are required to give up their faith to rid
themselves of “idolatrous anti semitism”.

Wonder how the good rabbi explains the pagan Romans
disdain for the chosen?

Or how about the Egyptians of old for that matter?

Or more recently Uncle Joe? Surely he was no Christian
gentleman as FDR liked to refer to him.

Mike Reisch

Rabbi: “As long as Christians keep Jesus as God, they
will be antisemitic.”

Australian Jewish News, Friday, July 26, 1996

Rabbi Dr. Pinchas Hayman, Excerpts:
CHRISTIANS have to make a choice – “either retain
their present belief system and be antisemitic or form
a partnership with the Jewish people.”

This is the view of Bar-Ilan University’s Rabbi Dr.
Pinchas Hayman, who is active in Jewish-Christian
dialogue and in encouraging modern Christianity to
return to its Jewish roots by observing the Seven
Noahide Laws.

“As long as Christians keep Jesus as God, they will be
antisemitic because that belief must lead them to
believe that those who reject Jesus reject God,” he
told the Australian Jewish News.

“That’s how the process of satanising the Jews began.
That belief is the root cause of 1500 years of the
Christian idolatrous antisemitism which led to the
Holocaust.”

Proficient in New Testament Studies and Classical
Greek, Dr. Hayman noted that at least five American
churches have given up belief in Jesus.

[END]

*******************************************************

BOOKS FOR SALE:

AVAILABLE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY NEWS LIBRARY:

* RICHARD ODORFER – THE SOUL OF GERMANY – HARD COVER
WITH GOLD IMPRINT – $30.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)

* UDO WALENDY – FORGED WAR CRIMES MALIGN THE GERMAN
NATION – $12.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)

* CHRISTINE B. MILLER – REALITY CHECK – SOFT COVER –
$10.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* WALTER F. MUELLER – REVISIONIST RESOURCE GUIDE –
$8.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* ERNST ZUNDEL – SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT – LETTERS
FROM CELL #7 – SOFT COVER – $6.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* JOHN RAWLINGS/MICHAEL PASSMORE (GERMAN TRANSLATION
GUENTHER DECKERT) – THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
NUEREMBERG RALLIES – SOFT COVER – BLACK/WHITE &
COLOR(COFFEE TABLE SIZE) – $ 35.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* SPECIAL EDITION – THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
NUREMBERG RALLIES (THE HOFFMANN RALLY CARDS) – SOFT
COVER – COLOR – $ 12.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* DER DEUTSCHE ADERLASS – BY DR. CLAUS NORDBRUCH –
SOFT COVER – IN GERMAN LANGUAGE – $ 25.00 (SHIPPING
INCLUDED)

To order, please send a check or money order to:

Community News
PO Box 191677
Sacramento, CA 95819

or e-mail us and we will send you an e-mail bill
through PayPal.

 

Walter F. Mueller
“The truth is back in business”

The “Patriot Letter” is a free news service of
Community News, a monthly publication with a
circulation of 20,000. To subscribe to Community News
please e-mail for more information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *