Patriot Letter. Dated 3/28/05.
Archived by k0nsl.
[NOTE: I do not necessarily agree with all the things written by Walther F. Mueller; I merely archive this newsletter because it does contain interesting bits worth saving.]
Dear Fellow Patriot!
Zundel In Germany:
For Zundel updates please visit the above website!
To submit news, information, etc. about Ernst Zundel,
I subscribe to the Sacramento Bee. So I get it pretty
early in the morning. The “Easter” issue wasn’t about
Easter at all. Not even Happy Easter. However, it was
all about Cesar Chavez. A parade of 700 people
remembered the Union leader.
Today was also Joe Serna Jr. Rememberance Day. Serna
Jr. was part of Cesar Chavez Commie troops and became
Mayor of Sacramento in 1992. So, instead of Easter, we
got “Commie Day”.
However, I had an excellent Easter Sunday. I was
invited to an Easter Party with lots of kids, an Egg
Hunt, Lobster Tails, Ham and Eggs, and Pineapple Cake.
SInce the Easter Holidays continue for us of German
heritage until tomorrow, Happy Easter again to all of
Still catching up with your mail:
German court OKs sugar in beer despite 1516 purity law
Feb 25, 2005 – A German brewer has won his battle
against Reinheitsgebot, the country’s 1516 beer purity
law that limits beer ingredients to malted grain,
hops, yeast and water.
A court has ruled that the Klosterbrauerei Neuzelle
brewery can continue to add sugar syrup to its beer
and call the product a beer. Helmut Fritsche has been
fighting 10 years for the right to dose his Schwarzer
Abt with sugar.
Threatened with a fine for daring to label his product
as beer, he fought local authorities only to have the
regional administrative court uphold their argument.
The Federal Administrative Court overturned that
decision, ruling that because the sugar syrup is added
after the beer was already fully brewed, Fritsche can
market the product as a “special beer” – as do
breweries that add herbs to their products at the end
of the brewing process.
After Germany was split into two following World War
II, some East German breweries began to add sugar to
the style known as Schwarzbier or offered it to
consumers with sugar on the side. When Germany
reunified, their beers once against became subject to
The standard applies only to beers made within
Germany, after a European Union court ruled that using
it to keep out imported brews would be contrary to
free trade rules.
Of course Israel must be pleased with choice of
Wolfowitz the Zionist.
This is all going according to the Protocols of the
elders of Zions
WE SHALL ENSLAVE GENTILES
6. At the same time we must intensively patronize
trade and industry, but, first and foremost,
speculation, the part played by which is to provide a
counterpoise to industry: the absence of speculative
industry will multiply capital in private hands and
will serve to restore agriculture by freeing the land
from indebtedness to the land banks. What we want is
that industry should drain off from the land both
labor and capital and by means of speculation transfer
into our hands all the money of the world, and thereby
throw all the GOYIM into the ranks of the proletariat.
Then the GOYIM will bow down before us, if for no
other reason but to get the right to exist.
7. To complete the ruin of the industry of the GOYIM
we shall bring to the assistance of speculation the
luxury which we have developed among the GOYIM, that
greedy demand for luxury which is swallowing up
everything. WE SHALL RAISE THE RATE OF WAGES WHICH,
HOWEVER, WILL NOT BRING ANY ADVANTAGE TO THE WORKERS,
FOR, AT THE SAME TIME, WE SHALL PRODUCE A RISE IN
PRICES OF THE FIRST NECESSARIES OF LIFE, ALLEGING THAT
IT ARISES FROM THE DECLINE OF AGRICULTURE AND
CATTLE-BREEDING: WE SHALL FURTHER UNDERMINE ARTFULLY
AND DEEPLY SOURCES OF PRODUCTION, BY ACCUSTOMING THE
WORKERS TO ANARCHY AND TO DRUNKENNESS AND SIDE BY SIDE
THEREWITH TAKING ALL MEASURE TO EXTIRPATE FROM THE
FACE OF THE EARTH ALL THE EDUCATED FORCES OF THE
8. IN ORDER THAT THE TRUE MEANING OF THINGS MAY NOT
STRIKE THE “GOYIM” BEFORE THE PROPER TIME WE SHALL
MASK IT UNDER AN ALLEGED ARDENT DESIRE TO SERVE THE
WORKING CLASSES AND THE GREAT PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL
ECONOMY ABOUT WHICH OUR ECONOMIC THEORIES ARE CARRYING
ON AN ENERGETIC PROPAGANDA.
Forwarded to me from a TRUE Confederate Southern
“At lunch today I was complaining about President
Roosevelt’s secret, unlawful, unconstitutional, moves
to put the U.S. into the 2nd German war, and a
coworker made a significant conversational point. He
said that FDR can be accused of anything at this
point, and still have the approval of the American
people, because the American people believe that the
second war against the Germans was a war against evil.
It’s not easy to refute that, but there are known
elements that could help.
The biggest element is the fact that Hitler moved
against Poland when the Poles moved against Danzig.
There is a chapter in A.J.P. Taylor’s book, The
Origins of the Second World War, entitled War for
Danzig. There’re not five Americans in a thousand who
know that Danzig was a large city of ethnic Germans
that was not politically part of Poland, it was a
“Free City” under the ageis of the Versailles
Commission, and the Polish government had no legal
right to it. Hitler had warned Beck, but Beck sent
his army in anyhow. Hitler then beat up the Poles,
and that was the excuse the Brits needed to wage war.
The original documents are cited by Taylor. Hoggan in
his book book, The Forced War gives detailed cites.
Another book giving an account of the German response
to the Polish move on Danzig is On Borrowed Time, by
Leonard Mosley; it is a good read but doesn’t
reference detailed cites.
[James Forrestal was the first American Secretary of
The Forrestal Diaries, edited by Walter Millis, p.121
“Played golf today with Joe Kennedy [Joseph P.
Kennedy, who was Roosevelt’s Ambassador to Great
Britian in the years immediately before the war]. I
asked him about his conversations with Roosevelt and
Neville Chamberlain from 1938 on. He said
position in 1938 was that England had nothing to fight
with and she could not risk going to war with Hitler.
Kennedy’s view: that Hitler would have fought Russia
without any later conflict with England if it had not
been for Bullitt’s [William C. Bullitt, then
Ambassador to France] urging on Roosevelt in the
summer of 1938 that the Germans must be faced down
about Poland; neither the French nor the British would
have made Poland a cause of war if it had now been for
the constant needling from Washington. Bullitt, he
said, kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans wouldn’t
fight. Kennedy that they would, and that they would
overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he says, states that
America and the world Jews had forced England into the
war. In his tellephone conversation with Roosevelt in
the summer of 1939 the President kept telling him to
put some iron up Chamberlain’s backside.
Kennedy’s response always was that putting iron
up his backside did no good unless the British has
some iron with which to fight, and they did not …”
There is also the report to Warsaw by the Polish
Ambassador in Paris
Diplomat in Paris, Memoirs of Juliusz Lukasiewicz p.
Report to Warsaw Paris, February, 1939
A week ago the ambasador of the United States, William
Bullitt, returned to Paris from a three months leave
in America. Meanwhile, I have had two long
conversations with him so I can inform you of his
views regarding the European situation and Washinton’s
1. A foreign policy of the United States as an
endeavor of direct participation in the development of
affairs in Europe does not and could not exist, since
it would not be endorsed by public opinion, which has
not changed its isolationist attitude in this respect.
On the other hand, there is a noticable increase in
the interest of the American people in the European
situation, to the extent that even domestic events
move into the background and lose the attention they
normally enjoy. The international situation in Europe
is considered in official circles as very seriously
threatening with the danger of an armed conflict.
Those in authority are of the opinion that, should war
break out between Britian and France on the
one side and Italy and Germany on the other, and
should Britian and France suffer defeat, the Germans
would directly threaten the real interests of the
United States on the American continent. For this
reason, in case of war the participation of the United
States on the side of France and Britian is already
envisioned, naturally some time after the start of
the war. As Ambassador Bullitt said: “Should war
break out, likely we shall not take part in at the
beginning, but we shall finish it”.
According to Ambassador Bullitt, the
above-mentioned attitude of official Washington
circles is not based on ideological motives but stems
entirely from the necessity of defending the realistic
interests of the United States, which, in case of a
Franco-British defeat, would be seriously and directly
menaced, from the Pacific as well as from the
Ambassador Bullitt, while stating that the rumor
according to which President Roosevelt was to have
stated that “the frontier of the United States lies in
France” was false, expressed the conviction of the
President might certainly might have said that he sold
airplanes to France because the French Army was the
first line of defense of the United States, this
being in complete accord with the President’s views.
2. There is no basis or argument which could even
partly justify Italian claims on France. Therefore,
France cannot and should not make any consessions,
even if only in appearance. Any surrender on the part
of France would undermine its prestige in Africa, and
therefore the possibility of any comprimise at the
expense of France should be excluded.
Theoretically, the fear may exist that, at a time
of tension, Britian, perhaps together with Berlin, may
attempt to force on France a compromise which would
not be in France’s interest. However, in such a case
France may count on strong support from Washington.
The United States, in its relations wth England, has
at its disposal many different and very powerful means
of pressure, and the threat to employ them would
suffice to hold Britian back from a policy of
compromise at the expense of France.
It must be recognized that British prestige has
suffered a severe setback in American public opinion
as a result of evens in the Far East and the Munich
conference, and that, on the other hand, American
public opinion realizes how much Britian desires
collaboration with the United States today and its
Under these conditions, it may be assumed that
Hitler and Mussolini will not decide on an open
conflict with England and France on the basis of
Italian demands from France.
It is, of course, the weak side of the American
position that, having already determined its attitude
in case of a possible armed conflict, at the same time
the United States is unable to contribute actively to
a positive solution of European problems, since the
isolationist American public opion does not allow
3. The attitude of official American circles
toward Italy and Germany is negative, mainly because
they consider that new successes of the Rome-Berlin
axis, which would undermine the prestige and authority
of France and England as imperial powers, would almost
directly threaten the actual interests of the United
States. Thus, Washington’s foreign policy will oppose
any development of the situation in this direction.
In its relations with Italy and Germany, the
United States has at its disposal various means of
pressure, which have already been seriously examined
and assessed. These means, chiefly of an economic
character, are such that they can be applied without
the slightest fear of internal opposition, and they
will undoubtedly be as forceful and effective for
Rome as for Berlin. Ambassador Bullitt is of the
opinion that pressure exerted by the United States
simultneously on Italy and Germany on the one side and
England on the other could contribute considerably
toward preventing the outbreak of an armed conflict of
the development on the European situation in a
direction undesirable from Washington’s standpoint.
Replying to my observation that in the present
circumstances it was not clear whether the United
States would be ready to fight Germany and Italy in
defense of French colonies, or to fight certain types
of governments and ideologies, Ambassador Bullitt
asserted categorically that Washinton’s attitude was
dictated by the actual interests of the United
States alone and not by ideological considerations.
I must add that Ambassador Bullitt seems to be
completely sure of France’s unconditional resistance
to Italian demands and that he consequently excludes
any possibility of British or British-German mediation
with the object of finding a compromise at the expense
For the time being, I should like to refrain from
formulating my own opinion regarding Ambassador
Bullitt’s statements, and before doing so, I would
like to have from him additional comments. However,
it seems certain that President Roosevelt’s policy
will henceforth take the course of supporting France’s
resistance, checking German-Italian pressure, and
weakening British tendencies toward compromise.
Ambassador of the Republic of Poland”
Dear Professor Beerenbaum,
I was told that you are a Holo… (or Shoah) expert. –
I am interestes in stories of Jews surviving the
so.called death / extermination camps in Nazi occupied
Europe as well as in “Reich” of those days.— Is
there any literature in English, French, and German
concerning this topic you can recommend me?
Looking forward to hearing from you soon.
On the Prerequisite
for World Renewal
” . . . A movement that wants to renew the world must
serve, not the moment, but the future.”
— THE BOOK, II:6/466 (HM edition)
He was—and IS—right!
PO Box 270486
Milwaukee WI 53227
For a handy, pocket-size compendium of His Words, send
PO Box 188
Ottawa Lake MI 49267
Let’s hear it from Bill:
>>>Matt Hale’s entire “career” is one of violence and
murder. Even though he personally could never be
connected to it until recently, his members could.<<<<
Matt Hale was an unknown pweson to me, until recent
The LA Times wrote in a recent article about a fellow
who who admitted to the recent murder, an individual
who had absolutely no connection to above Hale.
Sorry I misplaced the article.
A cute email from a “politically correct” person
A few months before I was born, my Dad met a stranger
who was new to our small Tennessee town. From the
beginning, Dad was fascinated with this enchanting
newcomer and soon invited him to live with our family.
The stranger was quickly accepted and was around to
welcome me into the world a few months later. As I
grew up, I never questioned his place in my family. In
my young mind, he had a special niche. My parents
complementary instructors: Mom taught me the word of
God, and Dad taught me to obey it.
But the stranger? He was our storyteller. He would
keep us spellbound for hours on end with adventures,
mysteries and comedies.
If I wanted to know anything about politics, history
or science, he always knew the answers about the past,
understood the present and even seemed able to
predict the future!
He took my family to the first major league ball game.
He made me laugh, and he made me cry. The stranger
never stopped talking, but Dad didn’t seem
Sometimes Mom would get up quietly while the rest of
us were shushing each other to listen to what he had
to say, and she would go to her room and read her
books. (I wonder now if she ever prayed for the
stranger to leave.)
Dad ruled our household with certain moral
convictions, but the stranger never felt obligated to
honor them. Profanity, for example, was not allowed
in our home … not from us, our friends or any
visitors. Our longtime visitor, however, got away
with four-letter words that burned my ears and made my
dad squirm and my mother blush. My Dad was a
teetotaler who didn’t permit alcohol in the home, not
even for cooking. But the stranger encouraged us to
try it on a regular basis.
He made cigarettes look cool, cigars manly and pipes
distinguished. He talked freely (much too freely!)
about sex. His comments were sometimes blatant,
sometimes suggestive, and generally embarrassing.
I now know that my early concepts about relationships
were influenced strongly by the stranger.
Time after time, he opposed the values of my
parents,yet he was seldom rebuked … and NEVER asked
More than fifty years have passed since the stranger
moved in with our family. He has blended right in and
is not nearly as fascinating as he was at first.
Still, if you were to walk into my parents’ den today
you would still find him sitting over in his corner,
waiting for someone to listen to him talk and watch
him draw his pictures.
We just call him TV.
Note: This should be required reading for every
household in America!
>>WHERE HAVE ALL THE BACKBONES GONE?<<<
Gone, due to a “Totally brainwashed society ”
And totally spoiled masses to lazy to think
independently and sober on their own. The white man in
digging his own grave at an ever accelerated speed.
The times when Professors Heisenberg, Max Plank and
many more in science were models to look up to,
in music individuals like Schubert, Beethoven, Strauss
and many more to listen to, that was replaced by
noise such as hard rock and similat acustic sounds.
In paintings, Duerer and a hole number of westeners
gifted painters are replaced bei “modern art” elevated
by the media and their brainwashing. Wasn’t there a
term called at one time “entartete Kunst”?
On and on it goes.
In philosophy, giants like Kant, Schopenhauer and
many, many more replaced by “politically correct”
>>>Roeder referred to the Bundesrepublik as a “pimp
republic”— which characterized “the most shameful
chapter in German history.”
Declaring “WE ARE ALL MANFRED ROEDER,” a number of
German citizens plan to accompany the uncompromising
dissident as he enters prison in Fulda. A similar
demonstration of solidarity and support is planned
upon his release.
Continuing the fight for a better world —<<<<<<<<<<
Bravo, bravo, bravo,
I wish I could join.
Apropos Manfred Roeder, I still have the beautiful
Manfred Roeder postcards, entitled:
“Through Political Justice incarcerated Truth
Defender, who only advocate for the well-being of
If you care to have one, I’ll send it to you for free.
It also includes a little bit of information about
BOOKS FOR SALE:
AVAILABLE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY NEWS LIBRARY:
* RICHARD ODORFER – THE SOUL OF GERMANY – HARD COVER
WITH GOLD IMPRINT – $30.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)
* UDO WALENDY – FORGED WAR CRIMES MALIGN THE GERMAN
NATION – $12.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)
* CHRISTINE B. MILLER – REALITY CHECK – SOFT COVER –
$10.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
* WALTER F. MUELLER – REVISIONIST RESOURCE GUIDE –
$8.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
* ERNST ZUNDEL – SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT – LETTERS
FROM CELL #7 – SOFT COVER – $6.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
* JOHN RAWLINGS/MICHAEL PASSMORE (GERMAN TRANSLATION
GUENTHER DECKERT) – THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
NUEREMBERG RALLIES – SOFT COVER – BLACK/WHITE &
COLOR(COFFEE TABLE SIZE) – $ 35.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
* SPECIAL EDITION – THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
NUREMBERG RALLIES (THE HOFFMANN RALLY CARDS) – SOFT
COVER – COLOR – $ 12.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
* DER DEUTSCHE ADERLASS – BY DR. CLAUS NORDBRUCH –
SOFT COVER – IN GERMAN LANGUAGE – $ 25.00 (SHIPPING
To order, please send a check or money order to:
PO Box 191677
Sacramento, CA 95819
or e-mail us and we will send you an e-mail bill
Walter F. Mueller
“The truth is back in business”
The “Patriot Letter” is a free news service of
Community News, a monthly publication with a
circulation of 20,000. To subscribe to Community News
please e-mail for more information.