Patriot Letter. Dated 1/23/05.

Archived by k0nsl.



Dear Fellow Patriot!

It’s another long weekend for me, I because I don’t
work Monday because of my birthday. Just one day
before Professor Robert Faurisson. I am making my own
birthday cake, which is a “Bienenstich” or as
Americans call it a Beehive cake.

Enough of that self-promotion. We put out the message
that Dr. Nordbruch’s book will be available through
Community News. The response was good. Our bookkeeper,
Hans, will send you all a note with instructions. “Der
Deutsche Aderlass” will be the pride of your library.
Please pass it on.


Yesterday I reported to you about Germany’s new “Nazi
scandal”, the “outrageous behavior” of the NPD
delegates to the State House of Saxony. Holger Apfel
and Juergen Gansel were labeled as “right-wing
extremists” for remembering the bombing holocaust of
Dresden and for announcing that they will bring
legislation to the house for a day of remembrance.

For this, the Central Jewish Committee is demanding a
criminal investigation of Holger Apfel and Juergen
Gansel for the emotional Goebbels like speech:

“To compare the bombing raids on Dresden with the
holocaust is demeaning to all of the Jewish victims,”

says the Jewish Central Committee.

Saxony Attorney General Andreas Feren confirmed that
the Attorney General’s Office has launched an
investigation against Apfel and Gansel for
“Volksverhetzung”. It is Germany’s infamous law
“Incitement of riots” that has put so many German
activists in prison.

Now even the duly elected officials to State Houses
are no longer safe when they don’t abide to the Jewish
social structure.


And again, another great piece from Professor Robert
Faurisson, whose birthday is coming up on Tuesday.


The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum: A Challenge

By Robert Faurisson

Robert Faurisson is acknowledged as Europe’s leading
Holocaust Revisionist. He was educated at the Paris
Sorbonne, and served as associate professor at the
University of Lyon in France from 1974 until 1990. Dr.
Faurisson has addressed several IHR conferences, and
many of his numerous essays and reviews on the
Holocaust issue have appeared in translation in the
Journal. This essay was translated by IHR editor
Theodore J. O’Keefe.

The question of the existence or non-existence of the
Nazi gas chambers is one of considerable historical
importance. If the gas chambers existed, they provide
evidence that the Germans attempted to physically
exterminate the Jews; on the other hand, if they
didn’t exist, we have no evidence of such an
extermination attempt. Pierre Vidal-Naquet, a leading
French anti-Revisionist, is under no illusion. To
those tempted to give up the controversy over the gas
chambers, he has warned that to jettison the gas
chambers “is to surrender in open country.” (Nouvel
Observateur, Sept. 21, 1984, p. 80.) One can only
agree. The gas chambers are not – contrary to what
Jean-Marie Le Pen once remarked – a mere footnote
(“point de détail”) of Second World War history. Thus,
those who contest their existence are subject to
judicial sanction in France and some other countries.

Nor could the monumental US Holocaust Memorial
Museum in Washington, DC, which was formally dedicated
on April 22, 1993, allow itself to ignore the Nazi gas
chambers. The question remained: What kind of physical
representation of this terrifying weapon would the new
Museum provide? We now know the answer, and it is
dismaying: For lack of anything better this opulent
museum – which has cost American taxpayers and donors
from the American Jewish community more than $150
million – has been reduced to showing us, as its only
model of a homicidal gas chamber, a casting of a gas
chamber at the former Majdanek camp in Poland: a gas
chamber for . . . delousing. As I shall explain, even
Jean-Claude Pressac, author of a 564-page work
published in 1989 in cooperation with the Beate
Klarsfeld Foundation of New York, was obliged to
acknowledge that this room was merely a delousing

This is nothing new. As early as 1945 the
Americans were portraying four delousing
(disinfestation) chambers in the Dachau camp (Germany)
as homicidal gas chambers.

Those in charge of the new Holocaust Museum in
Washington have resorted to so grave an imposture, I
believe, because they are forced to do so: they are
not able to offer visitors a physical representation,
in any form whatsoever, of one of the chambers, we are
told incessantly, the Germans used to murder swarms of

My Challenge in Stockholm and Washington

On March 17, 1992, I threw down the gauntlet to
the Jewish organizations of the entire world. On that
day, after arriving in Stockholm at the invitation of
my friend Ahmed Rami, I issued a challenge of
international scope to the Swedish media. It consisted
of this nine-word sentence: “Show me or draw me a Nazi
gas chamber!” These words were accompanied by two
pages of explanation.

According to my information, the Swedish media,
eager to answer my challenge, immediately contacted
every possible source in order to obtain photographs
of Nazi gas chambers. To their consternation, they
discovered that no such photographs exist, and that
the facilities or rooms currently portrayed to
tourists at Auschwitz and elsewhere as homicidal gas
chambers have none of the characteristics of such
chemical slaughterhouses. Although the Swedish media
leveled innumerable personal attacks against me, my
challenge was not mentioned in a single newspaper
article, or in a single word on radio or television.

Over the months the embarrassment would grow among
those who propagate the thesis of the physical
extermination of the Jews during the Second World War:
hence the frenzied agitation that has gripped Jewish
organizations worldwide.

On April 21, 1993, I renewed my challenge in
Washington, this time directing it to the officials of
the Holocaust Museum that was to be dedicated there
the next day, with President Clinton, several heads of
state, and Elie Wiesel in attendance. Among the Museum
officials I had in mind, I was thinking especially of
Michael Berenbaum, its Research Institute Director.

My challenge in Washington can be summed up as

Tomorrow the US Holocaust Memorial Museum will be
dedicated in Washington. I challenge the Museum
authorities to provide us a physical representation of
the magical gas chamber. I have searched for 30 years
for such a representation without finding it: neither
at Auschwitz, nor in any other concentration camp; not
in a museum, or a book; neither in a dictionary nor an
encyclopedia; not in a photograph, model or
documentary film.

Of course I am acquainted with certain attempts at
representation, but all of them are illusory. None
withstands examination. In particular, when one
understands the extreme dangers of using Zyklon B (a
commercial insecticide) or hydrocyanic acid (HCN), one
quickly realizes that the sites sometimes portrayed to
tourists as homicidal gas chambers could never have
served as chemical slaughterhouses without enormous
danger for everyone in the area. When one understands
the extreme – and inevitable – complexity of a gas
chamber for the execution of a single man by
hydrocyanic acid in an American penitentiary, one sees
immediately that the places portrayed as Nazi “gas
chambers” – where, day after day, veritable swarms of
victims were supposedly killed – lack today (and
lacked then) the least bit of the formidable machinery
that would have been required.

Apart from the matter of sealing the chambers, one
of the most serious problems to solve would have been
that of the entering the HCN-saturated chamber after
the execution to remove the corpses, themselves
saturated with the same poison. Hydrocyanic acid
penetrates into the skin, the mucous membranes, and
the bodily fluids. The corpse of a man who has just
been killed by this powerful poison is itself a
dangerous source of poisoning, and cannot be touched
with bare hands. In order to enter the HCN-saturated
chamber to remove the corpse, special gear is needed,
as well as a gas mask with a special filter. Because
physical exertion must be kept to a minimum (it
accelerates respiration, reducing the filter’s
effectiveness), it is necessary, before entering the
area, to evacuate the gas, and then neutralize it. On
this matter, I refer to the documents on gas chambers
used in American penitentiaries that I published in

I warn the officials of the US Holocaust Museum
and, in particular, Mr. Berenbaum, that tomorrow,
April 22, 1993, they need not offer, as proof of the
existence of Nazi gas chambers, a disinfection gas
chamber, a shower room, a morgue, or an air-raid
shelter. I am even less interested in a section of a
wall, a door, a pile of shoes, a bundle of hair, or a
heap of eyeglasses. I want a portrayal of an entire
Nazi gas chamber, one that gives a precise idea of its
technique and operation.

Evasion and Trickery

I knew this challenge could not be answered because,
as a matter of fact, for half a century they have been
telling us about Nazi gas chambers without ever
showing us one. I also fully expected that the Museum
would be reduced to playing a trick of some kind. But
just what kind of trick?

The answer would come the next day, April 22, the
date of the formal dedication. (The Museum opened to
the public on April 26.) On the 22nd, I obtained a
copy of a book of about 250 pages that presents itself
as a sort of catalog of the new Museum. This book is
by Michael Berenbaum, and is entitled The World Must
Know: The History of the Holocaust As Told in the
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (1993, xvi +
240 pages).

On page 138 are three photographs:

The first shows a Zyklon B canister and some pellets
of Zyklon B, which is described as a “highly poisonous
The second shows “a casting of the door to the gas
chamber at Majdanek . . . from the outside, SS guards
could observe the killing through a small peephole.”
The third photograph shows “the inside of a Majdanek
gas chamber. The blue stain is a chemical remnant of
Zyklon B.”(2)

The first photograph proves nothing more than that the
Germans used the insecticide Zyklon B. (This
commercial product was used throughout the world.) The
second and the third photos should be familiar to
visitors of the former Majdanek camp in Poland. They
will recognize the outer door and the interior door,
as well as a portion of the inside of the first
chamber shown to visitors there as an execution gas
chamber, even though this room has all the
characteristics of a delousing gas chamber. In this
regard, I will not cite here my own research,
including my photographs that show the entire room,
including the little annex containing a stove to
provide the heat, which was essential to circulate the
HCN from Zyklon B. (In the second photograph described
above, the intake vent for the air heated by the
furnace can be seen, at hip height, on the right.) Nor
shall I cite here the expert report of American gas
chamber specialist Fred Leuchter, which concludes
definitively that this room was a delousing gas
chamber where, not human beings but, at most,
typhus-bearing lice were killed.

J.-C. Pressac’s Admission

I shall content myself here by referring to
Jean-Claude Pressac, protege of the Beate Klarsfeld
Foundation and author of the 1989 anti-Revisionist
work Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas
Chambers (a misleading title, by the way). Here, then,
is Pressac’s opinion of the room that Berenbaum dares
to portray as a homicidal gas chamber:

The red-ochre bricks stained with dark blue were for
him [Bernard Jouanneau, an attorney who opposed
Faurisson in a 1982 court case in Paris] material and
visible proof of the existence of homicidal gas
chambers. The problem, for there is one, is that the
gas chamber presented has all the characteristics of a
DELOUSING [sic] installation. I am not saying that it
was never used to kill people, for that is possible
[here, Pressac is wrong. – R.F.3] but the traces of
Prussian blue are an absolutely certain indication of
use for delousing purposes. (p. 555.)

Pressac goes on to note that the presence of a
peep-hole is no proof of a homicidal gas chamber
because a delousing gas chamber may be furnished with
such a peep-hole. He concludes:

I am sorry to say, and I am not the only one in the
West, that the Majdanek homicidal and/or delousing gas
chambers are still waiting for a true historian, which
is mildly upsetting in view of the fact that the camp
fell into the hands of the Russians intact in 1944 (p.

On page 557 he presents a photograph of the exterior
of the gas chamber in question and of another gas
chamber located in the same building. According to the
caption, this is a photograph

. . . showing one of the disinfestation gas chambers
thought to be a homicidal gas chamber. Between the two
doors with their inspection peep-holes, the darker
bricks are of Prussian blue colour, a sign of
prolonged use of “Blausäure/blue acid,” in other words
hydrocyanic or prussic acid sold as a delousing agent
under the name of “Zyklon B.”

It should be noted that these gas chambers were in the
Bad und Desinfektion (“Bath and Disinfection”)
building, located right at the entrance to the camp,
and in plain view.

It is understandable that in his “Bibliographical
Note” (pp. 224-232) Berenbaum makes no mention of
Pressac’s 564-page book.

A New Advance for Revisionism

In 1978 President Jimmy Carter established a
commission charged with creating a federal government
Holocaust memorial museum. He chose as its chairman
Elie Wiesel, thereby providing Arthur Butz with the
inspiration for a comment both accurate and sarcastic:
A historian was needed, but a histrion was chosen.

The choice of Berenbaum as the Museum’s
“scholarly” authority is of the same nature. Berenbaum
is an adjunct professor of theology at Georgetown
University. Where a historian was required, a
theologian was chosen – which is appropriate because,
for some years now, in place of the history of the
“Holocaust,” Jewish organizations have substituted the
religion of the “Holocaust.”

The central pillar of this religion, as I have
often said, is “the magical gas chamber that, like a
mirage, is the image of nothing real.”

To portray this “central pillar,” Museum officials
selected a delousing gas chamber falsely labeled as a
homicidal gas chamber. Although it was designed and
built by the Germans as a facility for protecting the
health of Jewish and non-Jewish prisoners, it is
presented to us as an instrument for the torture and
murder of these inmates. This portrayal epitomizes the
deceit and the effrontery of the zealots of the
“Holocaust” religion.

The time has come for a little more intellectual
honesty and sanity regarding the story of the Jewish
people’s real misfortunes during the Second World War.
Visitors to the new Holocaust Museum in Washington –
particularly American taxpayers, without whom it would
not exist – have a right to demand an accounting from
Mr. Berenbaum and his friends. A recent article in the
Los Angeles Times was headlined “Poll Finds 1 Out of 3
Americans Open to Doubt There Was a Holocaust.” (April
20, 1993) The doubts will increase.

A few days after the Museum’s formal dedication,
Berenbaum revealed to a newspaper:

You’re surrounded by death [in the Museum]. It’s like
working in an emergency room or a mortuary. . . . I’ve
ended up on an analyst’s couch. (The Washington Post,
April 26, 1993, p. B6.)

It is not out of the question that Berenbaum will
return to the analyst’s couch when he grasps the grave
consequences of his deception. April, 22, 1993, was
supposed to be a date for the consecration of the
“Holocaust” religion on American soil. In reality,
this date will go down in history as marking an
outstanding victory for revisionist historians.

A few of the two hundred or so persons who rallied
in Washington, DC, on April 22 to express opposition
to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.

To conclude, I would like to pay tribute here to
those revisionists who have contributed to the victory
on this specific point:

First, to Ahmed Rami, exiled in Stockholm, who allowed
me to publicly launch the “Stockholm Challenge” of
March 17, 1992;
Next, to the Institute for Historical Review in
southern California, which, since 1979, has, more than
any institution in the world, made possible the
publication of books, essays and articles on the
“Holocaust” of a scholarly and often unrewarding
nature, and this in spite of repression, persecution
and violence; this Institute has organized eleven
conferences under sometimes difficult and even
dramatic conditions, and, as a matter of fact,
arranged the meeting in suburban Washington, DC, on
April 21 where I was able to renew my Stockholm
Challenge, this time to the US Holocaust Memorial
Finally, to Ernst Zuendel of Toronto, without whom
“Holocaust” revisionism would probably still be
struggling in obscurity.

My thoughts are also of the French revisionists who
have expended so much effort, among them one person in
particular, whom I cannot mention without putting in
danger, who could be called the mainspring of the
revisionist movement in France.



From the Adelaide Institute:


The Case of Dr med. Mag. theol.Ryke Geerd HAMER
imprisoned at Fleury Merogis Prison, France

Contact him at
Docteur Geerd R. Hamer
N° d’ écrou 334 750 J
M.A. de Fleury-Mérogis
7, avenue de Peupliers
F-91705 Ste. Généviève des Bois



B. Peterson:


“In this confession (of Rudolf Höss), the description
of the actual gassing is remarkably short and vague.
However, it is essential to realize that all those
others who claim to have been present at this sort of
an operation are also vague and brief and that their
statements are full of contradictions on certain
points. Rudolf Höss writes, “Half an hour after having
released the gas, we would open the door and turn on
the fan. We would immediately begin to remove the
bodies.” I call your attention to the  word
“immediately”; in German the word is “sofort.” Höss
then adds that the crew in charge of handling and
removing 2,000 bodies from the “gas chamber” and
transporting them to the crematory ovens did so while
“eating or smoking”; therefore, if I understand
correctly, these duties were all performed without gas

masks. Such a description runs counter to all common

I would guess that, even though under great duress,
Höss included sufficent incorrect detail to his
“confession” so that later an informed person
would understand his statement was not true.  In a
similar way some American pilots held by the North
Vietnamese managed to negate the words they were
forced to utter.
B Peterson



Mel Fowler:


Is Culture Destroyed By Multiculturalism ?

Multiculturalism erodes culture in a complex of ways,
thus contributing to its destruction, as do war and
conquest, depletion of natural resources, religion,
capitalism, materialism, chronic diseases, and other
factors.  But culture is destroyed irreversibly only
by the radical attrition or extinction of the race
whose culture it is.  Race mixing is the great
destroyer of races.  Therefore, race mixing is also
the great destroyer of culture, and is the lethal
element in multiculturalism.

When the people who created a culture disappear, their
culture goes with them.  Superficial forms of some
cultural elements such as religion  –  the husk of
such cultural material, so to speak  –  may be adopted
by another race, or by people of mixed race, but never
the culture itself.  Imitation is the best they can
do.  When the genius of a race is sufficiently
adulterated, the race ceases to be creative, although
the great works of the past may continue to be held up
with pride, as if they are the works of the present.
The deterioration of race tends to remain unrecognized
as the cause of cultural deterioration.

For the few people who care deeply about the
continuity of authentic culture, democracy ought to be
seen as a disaster because it gives a voice and a vote
to the great hoard of people to whom the higher
manifestations of culture, invisible as they are to
them, are of no value, although the matter is
complicated by the fact that the sea of culturally and
intellectually obtunded people of our society are more
attributable to the class-defining social system which
favors intelligence only when it is beneficially
associated with money  –  which it worships  –  than
any lack of native intelligence and talent distributed
throughout the population.  Continuously from the
French revolution forward, the word democracy is
little more than a fraud on the public, employed by
scoundrels to fool the people into supporting them in
their lust for power.

In regard to culture in the serious meaning of the
term, quite obviously the single most devastatingly
limitating feature of our society is its utter failure
to invest in the mental and cultural development of
our people.  That fact is glaringly obvious proof that
the privileged classes, those who control the
application of social resources, are abysmally lacking
in any regard whatsoever for those outside their
moneyed circle.   The awareness of this fact ought to
be the starting point of all serious education.
However, we have suffered this hideous societal
deficit as far back as the mind of man reaches, the
result of which is that almost no one is even faintly
aware of it!  This is one of the very strange facts of

As bad as things are now in respect to the matters
outlined in the preceding paragraph, one can
reasonably expect them to become infinitely worse if
the masonic/talmudic/money elite achieve the global
dictatorship they are in pursuit of.

Mel Fowler



From Kevin Lyons:


Zionism Promotes Anti-Semitism
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern
Zionism, recognized that anti-Semitism would further
his cause, the creation of a separate state for Jews.
To solve the Jewish Question, he maintained “we must,
above all, make it an international political issue.”

Herzl wrote that Zionism offered the world a welcome
“final solution of the Jewish question.” In his
“Diaries”, page 19, Herzl stated “Anti-Semites
will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries
our allies.”

Zionist reliance on Anti-Semitism to further their
goals continues to this day. Studies of immigration
records reflect increased immigration to the Zionist
state during times of increased anti-Semitism. Without
a continued inflow of Jewish immigrants to the state
of “Israel”, it is estimated that within a decade the
Jewish population of the Zionist state will become
the minority.

In order to maintain a Jewish majority in the state of
“Israel”, its leaders promote anti-Semitism throughout
the world to “encourage” Jews to leave
their homelands and seek “refuge”.

Over the recent years there has been a dramatic rise
in hate rhetoric and hate crimes targeted toward Jews:

In Turkey…horrifying suicide bombings at two
synagogues left 25 people dead and hundreds more
injured. In Britain…Scotland Yard recently warned
Britain’s Jewish Community that it faced imminent
terrorist attacks after police spotted and questioned
a group of  “tourists” taking covert videotape of the
Jewish community buildings in London. In France…a
caution was issued after an arson attack gutted a
suburban Paris Jewish school–the latest incident in a
frightening wave of French anti-Semitism. BBC – UK:
“In recent weeks, a poll for the European Commission
suggesting that EU citizens see Israel as the biggest
threat to world peace caused outrage among Israelis.”
Anti-Semitic acts are on the rise across Europe and
beyond. From Antwerp and London to Berlin and
Istanbul, Jews are living in fear.

On November 17, 2003 Zionist leader, Ariel Sharon, the
Israeli prime minister, told Jews in Italy the best
way to escape “a great wave of anti-Semitism” is to
move and settle in the state of Israel. This has been
the Zionist ideology from the beginning to the present
time. “The best solution to anti-Semitism is
immigration to Israel. It is the only place on Earth
where Jews can live as Jews,” he said.

July 28, 2004: 200 French Jews emigrated to Israel
following a wave of Anti-Semitism. They were
personally greeted by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon, who recently urged French Jews to flee to
Israel to escape rising anti-Semitism.

On July 18, 2004, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
urged all French Jews to move to Israel immediately to
escape anti-Semitism. He told a  meeting of the
American Jewish Association in Jerusalem that Jews
around the world should relocate to Israel as early as
possible. But for those living in France, he added,
moving was a “must” because of rising violence
against Jews there. ”



Chuck Baldwin:


A Review Of The President’s Inaugural Address
By Chuck Baldwin
January 21, 2005

Yesterday, President G.W. Bush took the oath of office
and delivered his second inaugural address. As
political speeches go, this one was rather brief only
consuming four typewritten pages. Following are
excerpts along with my abbreviated comments.

“I am determined to fulfill the oath that I have sworn
and you have witnessed.” (President Bush, January 20,
2005, Inaugural Address)

Unfortunately, President Bush either has no intention
of fulfilling his oath to “preserve, protect, and
defend the Constitution of the United States” or he
has no inclination as to what the Constitution says,
because virtually everything he has done since being
elected in 2000 has been egregiously unconstitutional.

From expanding unconstitutional federal funding and
oversight for public education to intensifying
unconstitutional federal police encroachments upon our
freedoms and liberties via the Department of Homeland
Security and Patriot Acts to unilaterally and
unconstitutionally ordering the invasion and
occupation of Iraq, President Bush has demonstrated a
calloused disregard for the Constitution. To now
proclaim that he is “determined to fulfill the oath
that I have sworn” is meaningless rhetoric.

“The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion
of freedom in all the world.” (President Bush, January
20, 2005, Inaugural Address)

This statement formed a redundant theme throughout the
President’s speech. For example, Bush also said, “the
ultimate goal of ending tyranny around the world.”
And, “one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach
the darkest corners of our world.” Still other similar
statements include, “the global appeal of liberty” and
“a world moving toward liberty”, etc.

The tenor and tone of the President’s speech are very
clear: G.W. Bush intends to use America’s armed forces
for imperialistic and expansionist purposes.
Therefore, I believe it is all but certain that Bush
will order our troops to invade and occupy Iran and
Syria and perhaps even plans an attack against North

It is yet to be seen how long Bush’s military
aggression will be tolerated by the American people.
After all, the cost in terms of American lives and tax
dollars are so far incalculable. One thing is certain:
we have not yet begun to see the tip of the proverbial

“The United States will not ignore your oppression, or
excuse your oppressors.” (President Bush, January 20,
2005, Inaugural Address)

Of course, the United States has ignored oppression
for decades. Two of the most egregious examples of
this are China and The Sudan.

The Communist Chinese government is one of the most
prolific murder machines in world history. The toll of
oppression and death inflicted upon the Chinese people
by this killing machine is impossible to calculate.

Yet, the United States has invested billions of trade
dollars into this monster with absolute disregard to
the suffering souls of China. President Bush has
continued the “one China” policy of his predecessors
and has freely imported China’s slave-labor products
to the point that America’s manufacturing base has all
but disappeared and our trade deficits continue to
break all-time records.

Likewise, President Bush has turned a blind-eye to the
suffering people of The Sudan. The Chinese-sponsored
Khartoum government has murdered more than 2 million
people during the past two decades with utter
impunity. The oppression and brutality inflicted upon
the Sudanese people staggers the imagination. Men are
crucified; women are raped into submission; children
are tortured and sold into slavery. Yet, the White
House seems totally oblivious to their plight.

“The unwanted have worth.” (President Bush, January
20, 2005, Inaugural Address)

I would like to believe that President Bush would
include unborn babies in this statement, but his
actions on this subject prove otherwise.

More than four million unborn babies have been
mercilessly slaughtered in the wombs of their mothers
since G.W. Bush first took office in 2001. Abortion on
demand is still practiced undaunted in these United
States, rhetoric to the contrary notwithstanding.

Regarding abortion, President Bush and his fellow
Republicans in Congress have proven to be “paper
tigers.” They talk pro-life during an election
campaign season, but they have no intention of
actually saving the lives of the unborn.

Even the Partial Birth Abortion bill which Congress
passed and President Bush signed is nothing but an
elaborate ruse to make Christians and pro-lifers feel
good about voting Republican. There was nothing of
substance to it!

If anything, the Partial Birth Abortion bill serves to
cement abortion on demand into the legal fabric of
America. By singling out only one abortion procedure
(the least one used, no less; it accounts for less
than one percent of all abortions), all remaining
abortion procedures are thereby certified to be
tolerable and legal.

Beyond that, President Bush has increased federal
funding for both domestic and overseas abortion
providers to record numbers.

He has consistently refused to make the life issue
pertinent to his selection of federal judges. In fact,
reports I have read indicate that no less than
two-thirds of his judicial appointments to date are
either neutral or lean pro-abortion. That is hardly
the track record of a true pro-life leader!

Add the fact that both Congress and the President have
the authority to end abortion on demand anytime they
would choose to do it, and one easily sees through
Bush’s pro-life façade.

Congress could end the federal government’s
endorsement of abortion on demand by exercising their
constitutional authority granted under Article III,
Section 2, to regulate and except appellate
jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, including the
U.S. Supreme Court. Such action would clear the way
for state legislatures to outlaw abortion on demand in
their respective states.

However, President Bush has shown no propensity to
encourage Congress to fulfill this constitutional
obligation. He has not even taken a position on Judge
Roy Moore’s Constitution Restoration Act which was
introduced in both chambers of Congress. (See

In addition, the President has the power to end
abortion on demand by refusing to execute what he
considers unlawful and unconstitutional Supreme Court
decisions. After all, the Supreme Court is not a power
unto itself. It is one of three coequal branches

of the federal government. As designed by the
founders, each branch holds check and balance on the
other. This means the judicial branch has no power to
execute any decision or opinion. That authority
belongs exclusively to the President.

For example, President Thomas Jefferson refused to
honor the Alien and Sedition Act. After being told the
Supreme Court upheld the law, Jefferson quipped,
(paraphrase) “Fine. Now let’s see if they can enforce
it.” Obviously, the Court had no authority to enforce
its opinion, so without Jefferson’s assistance, the
bill became moot. And note that Jefferson was not
removed from office by Congress.

The point is, if President Bush truly wanted to end
the slaughter of unborn innocents, he could do it! By
declaring unborn babies persons under the Fifth
Amendment, he could issue an Executive Order to his
justice department that the federal government would
not interfere with those states that would choose to
enact laws against abortion. Again, this would allow
state legislatures and state governors to implement
abortion laws as they deemed necessary.

Yet, neither a Republican-controlled Congress nor
President G.W. Bush has done anything consequential to
end abortion on demand. So much for Bush’s statement,
“the unwanted have worth.”

I really wish I could be optimistic about President
Bush’s second term. I cannot. I’m afraid that unborn
babies will yet be undefended. Furthermore, I fear
this president is leading America into a federal
police state at home and into an era of military
expansionism overseas. I pray I’m wrong.

© Chuck Baldwin


Chuck Baldwin’s commentaries are copyrighted and may
republished, reposted, or emailed providing the person
or organization doing so does not charge for
subscriptions or advertising and that the column is
copied intact and that full credit is given and that
Chuck’s web site address is included.

Editors or Publishers of publications charging for
subscriptions or advertising who want to run these
columns must contact Chuck Baldwin for permission.
Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in
scheduling an interview with Chuck should contact

Please visit Chuck’s web site at
When responding, please include your name, city and
state. And, unless otherwise requested, all
respondents will be added to the Chuck Wagon address

To subscribe to these columns, send a message to with the words
subscribe chuck-wagon      in the body of the message.
To unsubscribe put the words     unsubscribe
chuck-wagon   in the body of the message.



From M:


Dear Friends,

If you are proud of your German roots and would like
to show it, my friend Hartmut from Toronto does a
wonderful job with German Heritage Jewelry.  Click on
the link below and view the pictures on E-bay!  Enjoy!


An meine Freunde !
To my friends!
My EABAY Listings!
Greetings Hartmut

Mein EBAY !

25 unter Null, plus Wind

INFO out of my guest book!
Aus meinem Gästebuch..

Entry # 290
Date: 2005-01-21 21:11:30
Hartmut Reinsch ( /

~~~”INFORMATION for my GUESTS!”~~~
Here is my EBAY site with quite a few Ite
ms, including prices and pictures!

Please sent me an E-mail in case you’re interested in
some Items and I will see, what I can do as best
price in canadian Dollars or in EUROS.

Thank you
Greetings from Hartmut

My toll Free in Canada and in USA is
1 877-877 658-4653

~~~”Information für meine Gäste!”~~~
Hier ist, meine EBAY Seite mit vielen meiner
Schmuckstücke, mit den Bildern und auch die Preise in
US Dollars.

Wenn interessiert, bitte fragen sie für die
kanadischen Preise oder die Kosten in EUROS an.
Da werde ich sehen was am besten gemacht werden

Meine gebührenfreie Nummer in KANADA oder USA ist
1 877 658-4653





Walter, your emails get better and better.  I could
not, for the life of me, try to choose the best.  They
are all top shelf.

janet ny






The Boer people of South Africa are convening a prayer
meeting in Pretoria on Saturday the 29th January.  We
will pray for our political prisoners who are being
held on long term jail sentences in the filthy and
overcrowded prisons of the regime right across South
Africa as well as for our oppressed people in Southern
Africa. Our religious and political leaders are being
held under the most severe conditions.  The most
savage and brutal murders on whites in South Africa
can be viewed on  We call on all right
minded people and Christians all over the world to
unite with us in prayer on the 29th.  Only our God can
save us and our loved ones as a holocaust is unfolding
in Southern Africa.  Please reach out to us in our day
of despair.  This situation was forced down on our
once prosperous country by the liberal forces and
governments of the western world who now turn a blind
eye to what is happening in Southern Africa.
Please send messages of support and prayers that will
be read at the service to
And please forward this message to all your friends,
neighbours, churches and organizations.
In the service of the King of kings
Dries Kriel


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *