Patriot Letter. Dated 1/21/05.

Archived by k0nsl.

Dear Fellow Patriot!

Before I continue the birthday tribute to Professor
Faurisson, I have to bring you bad news. Dr. Robert
Countess has a brain tumor that is inoperable. The
hospital sent him home to die. I spoke with his wife
this evening, asking for permission to let you know.
Dr. Countess lost his speech and is unable to walk.

I have met Dr. Countess a couple of times and the
Patriot Letter published many of his comments. He was
quite opinionated, but I sure admired his courage and
tenacity. He’s written many speeches and has been a
speaker at many revisionist conferences.

Please say a prayer for Dr. Countess.


Now the continuance of Dr. Faurisson’s birthday


Translation in English of the dust jacket piece and of
the foreword for the second edition of my Ecrits
révisionnistes (1974-1998) (4 volumes).

Robert Faurisson,

Ecrits révisionnistes (1974-1998), 1st ed. in 1999, 2d
ed. in December 2004

In 1999 I published in France, with my own means, a
four-volume collection of essays entitled Écrits
révisionnistes (1974-1998). That semi-clandestine
publication caused me some serious trouble at the
time. I have decided nonetheless to publish soon a
second edition, revised and corrected.

To that purpose I have drafted both a new piece for
the dust jacket and a foreword. Attached you will find
these two texts in their English version. Should you
see fit to distribute them, please take care to
indicate in their headings the date of composition,
that is, May 2004.

The possibility of there appearing, in 2005, two
supplementary volumes entitled Écrits révisionnistes
(1999-2004) is not altogether ruled out

Robert Faurisson


Dust Jacket Piece (May 2004)

Robert Faurisson has concluded from his research that
the alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged
genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical
lie, which has made possible a gigantic
political-financial swindle whose main beneficiaries
are the State of Israel and international Zionism and
whose main victims are the German people — but not
their leaders — and the Palestinian people in their

He has demonstrated that, for physical and chemical
reasons, the alleged Hitlerite gas chambers could not
have existed. He has emphasised that the Germans had
wanted not to exterminate the Jews but to expel them
from Europe towards a Jewish national home elsewhere
than in Palestine; that was what they called “the
territorial final solution to the Jewish question”
(die territoriale Endlösung der Judenfrage).

Many European Jews, civilians or soldiers, died as a
result of wartime actions and notably in the typhus
epidemics, but many Jews survived and, in their
millions, dispersed throughout the world, going so far
as to create and people a new State, that of Israel.

Recently R. Faurisson has written that Adolf Hitler’s
weapons of mass destruction (gas chambers and gas
vans) existed no more at that time than do those of
Saddam Hussein today. The first lie received official
endorsement in November 1944 from an agency called the
War Refugee Board, created by president Roosevelt at
the instigation of Henry Morgenthau, Junior. The
second lie was launched by another Washington agency,
the Office of Special Plans, which president Bush
Junior created in 2002 at the instigation of Paul
Wolfowitz. The world is witness, at nearly sixty
years’ distance, to the same type of lie and the same
type of liars.

Born in 1929 of a French father and a Scottish mother,
R. Faurisson holds the agrégation des lettres (highest
competitive examination) and a doctorate in
“literature and the social sciences”. He was professor
at the University of Lyon-II where, in particular, he
taught the “criticism of texts and documents
(literature, history, media)”. Divested of his chair
by an unexplained ministerial ruling, he has suffered
numerous physical assaults and incurred many
convictions in the French courts for disputing the
myth of the “Holocaust”. He has published seven works:
three of literary revisionism and four of historical
revisionism. His four volumes of Écrits révisionnistes
(1974-1998) bring together in more than two thousand
pages articles, studies and critical revisions of
texts in which the upholders of an official history,
increasingly religious and repressive in character,
are seen to yield step by step, on the plane of
reason, before the arguments and discoveries of
historical revisionism initiated, in France, by Paul
Rassinier, author of Le Mensonge d’Ulysse (1950).


Foreword (May 2004)

The first edition of the present work dates from March
1999. I was indebted for its production to Serge Thion
and his lady friend, who had been willing to compile,
with a view to publication, articles and studies
which, in addition to some books or other revisionist
writings, I had drafted between 1974 and 1998. The
present edition reproduces the contents of the first
but not without abundant corrections of detail. I owe
this revised and corrected edition to Jean Plantin
and, especially, to Yvonne Schleiter. The index of
names has been reworked. In the absence of an index of
subjects, there is a “reader’s guide” which I owe to
Jean-Marie Boisdefeu. This second edition was supposed
to appear in 2001 but we have until now been
constantly forced to postpone it. I had promised in
addition to these four volumes a volume of
illustrations; I regret not being able to keep that
promise all the more as my work, essentially concrete,
would have benefited from the accompaniment of
documents and photographs of which, moreover, I
possess a great number.

On 2 February of this year, I devoted an article to my
“Sombre Appraisal of Historical Revisionism”. Since
that date, the situation has worsened. The conference
that was to have assembled more than two hundred
sympathisers of the revisionist cause on the 24th and
25th of April in Sacramento, the capital of
California, was cancelled and, in Toronto, the worst
is to be feared for Ernst Zündel, who has been kept
languishing for fifteen months in solitary confinement
without charge. His cruel detention has recently been
endorsed by a superior court in its refusal to issue a
writ of habeas corpus.

Today those active in revisionist research or
diffusion are very few. We may cite mainly Walter
Mueller, Ingrid Rimland, Germar Rudolf (helped by his
friend Jürgen Graf in Russia), Michael Santomauro and
Bradley Smith in the United States, Heinz Koppe in
Canada, Fredrick Toben in Australia, Carlo Mattogno in
Italy, Jean Plantin in France, Vincent Reynouard in
Belgium, Ahmed Rami and Serge Thion on the Internet.

On the scientific plane, revisionism has achieved
total victory. It no longer has a single adversary.
The Hilbergs, the Vidal-Naquets, the Klarsfelds, the
Berenbaums, the Deborah Lipstadts and one van Pelt,
happy with repeating as his own the flimsy arguments
of one Jean-Claude Pressac, have been reduced to
nothing. The revisionists find themselves opposed only
by Spielberg-style films, Yad Vashem ceremonies,
Disneyland-inspired museums, pilgrimages to Auschwitz,
continuous media ballyhoo, brainwashing at school and
at university and, finally, a State propaganda
buttressed by legislative repression. Our foes have
bowed to our strength in the field but practically no
one knows it, for the losers, what with their power in
the mass media and their virtuoso bluffing, go on
blowing their trumpets or shofars as if they had won
the battle.

Teir historians claimed that Hitler had carried out a
policy of extermination against the Jews, notably
using weapons of mass destruction called execution gas
chambers or gas vans. Besides, they assured us that,
on the Eastern front, the Einsatzgruppen had indulged
in gigantic massacres of Jews. In sum, they would have
us believe that nearly the entire community of Jews in
Europe had thus been exterminated.

Such a vast crime would have presupposed an order from
on high, a project, a plan, overall directives,
comprehensive instructions, financing, checks of
operations and expenditures, a multitude of specific
or general assessments, research into and development
of weapons the like of which humanity had never known,
along with the involvement of large numbers of
military men, scientists, engineers, labourers and
employees. An undertaking of the sort, especially if
conducted in tightest secrecy, would also have called
for an array of draconian measures. The whole project
would have left numerous pieces of irrefutable
evidence, both material and documentary. At first, the
official historians had the nerve to assert that such
evidence indeed existed, and “in abundance”. But to
the challenge to produce “one bit of proof, just one”
of their choosing, they beat a retreat and since then,
following the example of J.-C. Pressac, have invoked
only the existence of “criminal traces” or “beginnings
of proof”. Pursuing their withdrawal still further,
they have invented an account telling that the great
massacre happened without an order, without a
directive, spontaneously (like “spontaneous
generation”, in a way). The most prestigious of them,
Raul Hilberg, falling back from his original
affirmation that there had been two orders from the
Führer to kill the Jews, has been reduced to
maintaining that in fact it all came about without an
order, without a plan, and only thanks to “an
incredible meeting of minds” within the vast German
bureaucracy, and by “a consensus mind-reading” amongst
Nazi bureaucrats!

No one has been able to find any premises that might
have been a genuine execution gas chamber. Nor a
single execution gas van. In respect to the greatest
crime in the world the accusation cannot provide any
forensic study of the crime weapon. Amongst the
post-mortems there is not one that establishes gassing
as the cause of death. Those alleged witnesses to
“gassings” who have been put under precise
cross-examination in public court proceedings have
been unmasked. The “execution gas chambers” shown to
tourists have revealed themselves to be Potemkin
village contrivances. The massacres imputed to the
Einsatzgruppen have left behind no common burial sites
approaching the mass graves of the Katyn forest
slaughter (4,255 corpses counted), an acknowledged
crime whose perpetrators were our very own Soviet

On the other hand, there is no lack of facts to prove
that the 3rd Reich never had a policy of physical
extermination of the Jews. Even on the Eastern front,
the killing of an innocent Jewish civilian was
punishable by heavy sanctions, including the death
penalty. Those soldiers who engaged in any form of
excess with regard to Jews were liable to sentence by
a German court martial. There are countless examples
of measures taken, even in the camps, for the
protection of the Jews against the excesses inherent
to all forms of detention, as well as against the
ravages caused by the epidemics. The Germans had an
obsessive fear of disorder, of contagion, of the loss
of manpower; even at Auschwitz there were training
centres for young Jews to learn various manual trades.
Millions of Jews survived the war, in spite of the
great carnage throughout Europe at the time, and in
spite of the apocalypse of a Germany pulverised by the
Allied bombardments. Calling themselves “survivors” or
“miraculous escapees”, many still today make up the
membership of organisations craving financial
reparations. Now, fifty-nine years after the war, the
number of these “survivors” has recently been
estimated at 687,900 (the figure given by New York
based demographer Jacob Ukeles, cited in the article
by Amiran Barkat “US Court to discuss question of who
is a Holocaust survivor”, Haaretz, 18 April 2004).
During the war, Jewish leaders uttered alarming words
about an extermination of the Jews, but their conduct
showed that they did not really believe in it. The
Allied governments saw that they were dealing with
“Jews trying to stoke us up”. And then, the “brown
Jews” of the “international Jewish collaboration” were
not wanting. Zionists and National-Socialists shared,
to a certain degree, a particular worldview; hence, in
1941, the Stern Group’s offer of military
collaboration with Germany against the British. As
late as 21 April 1945 a member of the World Jewish
Congress, Norbert Masur, was received by Himmler to
discuss the matter of Jews to be delivered to the

The Germans sought to expel the Jews from Europe, if
possible with the accord of the rest of the world.
They had in mind a “territorial final solution of the
Jewish question” (“eine territoriale Endlösung der
Judenfrage”, as written in a foreign ministry
memorandum of 21 August 1942 bearing the signature of
an official called Martin Luther).

In France on 6 March 2004, during Thierry Ardisson’s
television discussion programme “Tout le monde en
parle” (“Everyone’s talking about it”), admiral
Philippe de Gaulle was heard to state, regarding the
Jews: “The Germans wanted, if not to exterminate them,
at least to get them out [of Europe]”. That
reflection, hardly lacking in soundness, met only with
silence in the media. Also hidden from the general
public is the fact that neither Churchill, nor Eden,
nor Roosevelt, nor Truman, nor Eisenhower, nor de
Gaulle, nor Stalin ever cared to mention the “gas
chambers” or the “gas vans”. Those amongst them who,
years after the conflict had ended, wrote their
wartime memoirs also persisted in keeping quiet on the
subject, as did Pius XII, although he was yet more
hostile to Hitler than to Stalin (see Robert
Faurisson, Le Révisionnisme de Pie XII, 2003, 120 p.).
Adolf Hitler’s “weapons of mass destruction”, his
alleged execution gas chambers and gas vans, existed
no more than the “weapons of mass destruction” of
Saddam Hussein. In the two instances the lie and the
liars have been of identical origin: in 1944, under
the aegis of Franklin Roosevelt, the War Refugee Board
spawned by Henry Morgenthau Jr and, in 2002, under the
aegis of George Bush Jr, the Office of Special Plans
spawned by Paul Wolfowitz.

Unhappily, today, intoxicated by holocaustic
propaganda, people are not of a mind to call their
beliefs into question. The “Shoah” has become a
religious superstition inspiring reverence or fear.
Conscious both of its own fragility and of the
precarious standing of the State of Israel, of which
it is the sword and the shield, this religion has
erected daunting walls of defence, and harshly
suppresses any who seek to stand up to it. In the
past, it took courage and sacrifices to be a truly
active revisionist; to remain one in future will
require the heroism of Antigone and an uncommon




By Walter F. Mueller

The most insulting German-bashers are the Americans of
German heritage. I constantly run into these
“nestbeschmutzers” and I despise them greatly. A prime
example was the Sacramento Turnverein in 2004 by
paying tribute to the Jews.

Alpenland, a company that in great part sells German
goods, is another “nestbeschmutzer”. In their
Valentine 2005 catalog, they promote German music CDs
from the time of the Fuehrer’s reign:

“Trostreiche Lieder in Trostloser Zeit: 1939 – 1944”
“Hopeful Songs in Hopeless Times: 1939 – 1944”

“Tanzmusik aus Deutschland’s Dunkelsten Jahren”
“Dance Music from Germany’s Dark Years”

Besides that this is an oxymoron, it is also brown
nosing of the worst kind.

We can’t have anything positive about the “Nazi era”.
Well, guess what, just the mere fact that hopeful
songs and dance music were written proves otherwise.
It’s all demonizing propaganda. It is part of the
gigantic lies of the holocaust that Reich’s Chancellor
Adolf Hitler was opposed to film, music and art.

Sure, films like “The Fockers” and “American Pie”
would have been banned, but I believe that would have
been a blessing.

What you don’t hear about is that during the Fuehrer’s
leadership the arts, movie industry and the
entertainment industry flourished. Many great actors
were created during the “Nazi era” and lived on to
become superstars in Europe:

Lilian Harvey, Willi Fritsch, Heinz Ruehmann, Hans
Albers, Willi Forst, Zarah Leander, Marikka Roeck,
Renate Mueller, Paul Hartmann, and many more.

Original filmcards from 1935 until 1944 prove that
many popular movies were created during Hitler’s
reign. “Viktor und Viktoria” was a German original.
First played in German theaters in 1935.

“The Man who was Sherlock Holmes” premiered in German
theaters on 7-15-1937. Stars like Hans Albers and
Heinz Ruehmann played the leading roles.

The Fuehrer’s taste, when it came to art, music and
theater was impeccable. I think Robert Wagner, Josef
Strauss, and Leni Riefenstahl are a prime example.

German songs like “Lili Marleen” were written during
Adolf Hitler’s leadership. More than 200 famous German
songs, which are still being played today, originated
during the “Nazi era:”

Es geht alles vorueber – Heimat deine Sterne – Das
kann doch einen Seemann nicht erschuettern – Davon
geht die Welt nicht unter – Ich weiss es wird einmal
ein Wunder geschehn – La Paloma – and so many more.

We are not even mentioning the great military songs
that were inspired by Adolf Hitler’s leadership.

Of course, I am not denying that there were several
artists, art, and actors that were banned. Rightfully
so. They were all people who could only express
themselves through filth.

Since the Jews cannot deny the tremendous contribution
of German art during Adolf Hitler, they force business
owners to put disclaimers on such as the one above.

Rudi Schurike was kind of the Glenn Miller of Germany.
He became most famous during the Third Reich.

Germany flourished during Reichs Chancellor Adolf
Hitler. Especially in the arts, music, film and
theater. I can understand that it is hard for American
society to understand that a leader can be opposed to
the filth and decadency that is so inherent of today’s
art and entertainment in the U.S.

In order to bring back a country from the dark decades
of Jewish filth, it had to be made sure that foremost
the arts and the entertainment industry were cleaned
up. That meant the Jews were banned from working in
that industry in Germany.

Of course, when one looks at the latest box office
hits in America and realizes that a movie called
“Fockers” has become a number 1 movie, one can
understand why America believes the lies of the

But don’t take my words for it. Go, look around what
is being labeled as art today, or music, or
entertainment. Violence, filth and sex are the three
components of America’s entertainment today. Look what
it has done to our children. I believe any decent
leader should not tolerate these social standards.

So the notion that Germany’s art and entertainment
community was crippled during the reign of Adolf
Hitler is yet another gigantic lie. The opposite
happened. It flourished, because the standards had
been raised, and only the best became public icons.

No drug-using and wife-beating sports stars ever
existed in the Third Reich. The Third Reich was a
Reich of geniuses, innovation, invention, music and
thinkers. Reichs Chancellor Adolf Hitler was a patriot
of the arts. An art that was representative of the
great people of Germany.

If sperm drinking, pie fondling, dog feces eating, and
mass killing is the art, film and music that
represents today’s American society, please bring back
Adolf Hitler.


And since we are on the subject, this letter I picked
up from the VNN Forum:


Subject: book reviews

Hi Alex,

Aren’t you a little disturbed or at least disappointed
that any threads on VNNF dealing with the arts,
literature, or even a simple book review receive such
scant attention, while the “National Enquirer” type
threads dealing with WN dirt get thousands of hits? I
could, for example, post a thread that said “Kevin
Strom is a faggot” and get at least 50 responses in
the next hour. On the other hand, when you or I posted
(which we have) thoughtful reviews of important books,
the response on this board has been a deafening

best wishz,



Adelaide Institute:


Andreas Röhler, publisher of Sleipnir, has been
resisting the Berlin authorities for many years. As a
former East German, his dialectically-trained mind is
sharper than that of the state prosecutors’ and judges
who wish to silence him.

As in the Horst Mahler case, a frustrated public
prosecutor attepted to silence Röhler by having him
certified – without success.

Use of such Soviet-style psychiatric tricks is still
not yet accepted as a matter of course, but one may
surmise that it is only a matter of time before
judicial personnel in power will use psychiatry to
stifle intellectual dissent in Germany.

[The USA is not far behind such moves either because
the US government has hired former STASI-boss Marcus
Wolf and KGB-boss General Yevgeni Primakov to work for
Homeland Security – check reference on this]

A questionable financial-tax complaint has now been
levelled against Röhler. This trick was also recently
used by the German authorities against Germar Rudolf,
which lead to Rudolf incurring a massive financial

Andreas Röhler needs your financial support –



From John Martin, London:


Girl, 3, starved to death – Police
From correspondents in Duesseldorf, Germany

A GERMAN nurse had admitted starving her
three-year-old daughter to death, decapitating her,
cutting up the body and hiding it in plastic bags for
two years on her balcony, police said today.

The 26 year-old woman, whose identity was not
released, had made the admission to her husband after
investigators searched her apartment on Wednesday,
police said.

Police described the crime as “especially appalling
and almost unimaginable”.

The woman, now in police custody, was apparently sane,
said prosecutor Ralf Herrenbrueck.

She told investigators her daughter had begun to
refuse to eat from November 2002 onwards, so she
stopped feeding her. “I noticed that my daughter was
dying,” she told police.

When the child died, the mother kept the body under
her bed for some days before decapitating it in order
to place it in a plastic container. She then cut the
body into pieces in her bath and placed the parts in
bags on her balcony.

Police said neighbours had complained of a dreadful
smell from the apartment.

The woman’s husband, who moved out of the family home
11 months after the child’s death, told police he had
had no inkling of what happened.

He said that after a while he had given up asking
where his daughter was because he was frightened of
arguing with his wife, who had given varying accounts
to explain the disappearance.

The couple have a second daughter, aged four, who has
been taken into care by social services.



John Martin:


Dear Walter,

With all the recent commentary on Martin Luther King,
I thought a poem I wrote back in 1978 might be of
interest. It was published in the Jan.,1978 “The
Liberty Bell” of George Dietz.
— Jack Martin

Poem follows along with my note to George Dietz:


Dear George,

Last week our daughter’s fifth grade class was given
an assignment to write a poem in honor of the late
Martin Luther King Jr. on the occasion of his
birthday. My wife sent the teacher – a negress – a
note requesting that our daughter be given a different
assignment. This teacher, on reading the note,
imperiously informed our daughter that she had already
been given her assignment.
Upon being apprised of that I felt positively inspired
to write the enclosed poem, and I thought you might
like to use it in the Liberty Bell.

Yours truly,

John Martin



I didn’t want to write a thing
Concerning Martin Luther King,
Yet you insisted that we must,
So you won’t take offense, I trust,
As I say what I’ve heard and read
About this unconverted red.

A poem of praise I cannot write,
For I am proud of being white.
And yet, a poem you do require,
No matter what I might desire.
A poem, therefore, you shall receive,
Not one you’ll like though — I believe:

“I have a dream,” King shouted loudly,
The black man soon will stand up proudly.
Equality! — we’re “free at last!”
He thundered with a mighty blast.
Equality through integration
And concomitant miscegenation.

To equalize, one thing is needing:
We must have racial interbreeding!
Raise up the lower, reduce the better,
We need a common denominator!
We’ll integrate to make us free,
The White Man has no right to be!

Culture, science, and civilization,
Uniquely are White Man’s creation.
However, this will count for naught,
As full equality is sought.
We’ll tear down all that he has built,
Equality will hide our guilt.

‘We’ll use’Non-Violence’, King claimed,
Small comfort to the killed and maimed.
For violence followed in his wake,
While looters grabbed what they could take.
Their grievances, more imagined than real,
They set out to avenge with savage zeal.

“Burn baby, burn!” the looters chanted,
“Kill Whitey!” the cannibals all ranted.
White politicians gave assent
To this denigrating descent.
“Their cause is right, their demands are just!”
Asserted this vermin, to our disgust.

Thirty pieces of silver was sufficient
To satisfy the liberal, mental deficient,
Which financiers were glad to pay
To those who joined this treasonous fray.
Yet, retribution will surely come
To this abominable scum.

They abetted this explosion
To buy the votes and please the ‘Chosen’.
While these looked on with much elation,
The pols betrayed both – race and nation.
They said, “Give all that they demand,
Or violence will mar our land.”

Open housing, affirmative action –
Our enemies smile with satisfaction.
School busing and integration –
Or is it just disintegration?
As they ring down the final curtain,
The White Man’s doom is all but certain.

Now – who shall carry the White Man’s burden?

For if he goes, you will go, too,
With no one left to carry you.
You cannot build, invent, create,
So, back off now, ere it’s too late!
We’ll win this struggle, never doubt it,
We’ll fight until the schemer’s routed!

Thereupon we will be free
To fulfill the White Man’s Destiny.
We’ll build, invent, explore, discover,
The secrets of the universe uncover.
All may gain by our ability,
But – never from King’s ‘Equality!’












To order, please send a check or money order to:

Community News
PO Box 191677
Sacramento, CA 95819

or e-mail us and we will send you an e-mail bill
through PayPal.


Walter F. Mueller
“The truth is back in business”

The “Patriot Letter” is a free news service of
Community News, a monthly publication with a
circulation of 20,000. To subscribe to Community News
please e-mail for more information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *