PATRIOT LETTER: CATCHING UP WITH YOUR MAIL: SIEGFRIED VERBEKE — GERMAR RUDOLF — DR. TOBEN — M — FRITZ — MONIKA — HANS MOHR

Patriot Letter. Dated 3/15/05.

Archived by k0nsl.

[NOTE: if there are formatting issues in any of the newsletters archived by me that’s because the original had these issues too and if I encounter something that’s totally messed up I’ll fix it. But minor issues will be left alone.]

Dear Fellow Patriot!

 

Zundel In Germany:

http://www.adelaideinstitute.org

For Zundel updates please visit the above website!

To submit news, information, etc. about Ernst Zundel,
please e-mail

info@adelaideinstitute.org

 

Siegfried Verbeke:

[START]

CC. Anne Frank Diary.

Some years ago, I was on trial in Amsterdam, libeled
by the Anne Frank Foundation Amsterdam and Basel
(Swizerland), because of publishing Faurissons
critical book about Anne Frank’s Diary + my own
comments.
The Foundations asked the court that I and anyone else
in the future should be convicted, when doubting about
the authenticity. They wanted that the court should
“canonize” or declare for authentic the famous Anne
Frank Diary.

But, at the end of the trial I was not convicted
because of doubting about the authenticity! The court
was in a difficult situation, because I asked the
court to show me at least that authentic diary if they
want to canonize it. This was impossible, the original
Diary doesn’t exist anymore, excepted for some 1944
months/entries.

Otto Frank coming home didn’t found his daughter’s
diary, because she probably destroyed it herself. He
found only the entries of the last ’44 months, before
being arrested and deported. What he found was Anne
Frank’s novel “Het achterhuis” “The annexe” (or
“The attic”), a phantasy-story, based on her diary of
the last years. Anne wanted to become a famous writer
on one side, and she didn’t want that someone else
would ever read her personal diary, which for that
time were very “personal” about her parents, and about
a young girl’s sexual interest. She wrote herself,
that she would make it so, that nobody would ever read
it.
It’s my hypothesis, that she burned all authentic
diary-entries, after she had used them for writing the
novel.

In any case, what you read now, is “The attic”, a
novel, and NOT her diary. I was not condemned on the
heart of the matter. I was only condemned for libel
because Faurtisson qualified Otto Frank as a literary
fraudeur.

General conclusion
It is always the same: a novel becomes an authentic
diary; a crematory becomes a gas chamber; deportation
becomes extermination; a Palestinian who figths for
his country is a terrorist; a country where the the
original people are not allowed to live in or even to
vote, is a western democracy.

Siegfried Verbeke

[END]

*******************************************************

Germar Rudof:

[START]

Liebe Freunde, Kunden, Unterstützer und Mitarbeiter!
Werte Spitzel, Denunzianten, Feinde und Verfolger!

Soeben habe ich vier weitere Bücher und Broschüren aus
meiner (Germar Rudolfs) Feder im PDF-Format zum
Herunterladen ins Internet gehängt. Zwei davon sind
bereits im Druck, die zwei kleineren gehen diese Woche
zum Drucker. Bei der Lektüre wünsche ich viel Spaß,
und ich würde mich freuen, wenn Sie sich bereit finden
könnten, auch gedruckte Exemplare dieser Werke zu
bestellen.

Die zwei Broschüren “Eine Zensur findet statt” und
“Diktatur Deutschland” eignen sich hervorragend,
Menschen auf die unrechtmäßig Verfolgung
Andersdenkender in Deutschland aufmerksam zu machen,
denn sie enthalten keine Aussagen über historische
Streitfragen.

Die letzte Broschüre ist eine sachliche Einführung in
den Holocaust-Revisionismus als Methode.

Die letzten drei Broschüren sind ergänzte Auszüge aus
dem ersten hier aufgeführten Buch. Sie beinhalten
spezifische Themen, die es Wert sind separat
dargestellt zu werden.

Diese Email darf (oder sollte gar) weiter verbreitet
werden.

Herzlichen Dank für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit, Ihr

Germar Rudolf
Castle Hill Publishers
PO Box 25 77 68
Chicago, IL 60625, USA
++1(773) 769 1121
chp@vho.org
G. Rudolf: Kardinalfragen an Deutschlands Politiker.
Aufforderung zur Wiederherstellung der Menschenrechte
in Deutschland  (2005, 432 Seiten)
http://www.vho.org/D/kadp
Germar Rudolf, Jahrgang 1964, gehört heute zu den
weltweit bekanntesten Holocaust-Revisionisten. In dem
vorliegenden Werk beschreibt er, was ihn, den einst
fanatisch Holocaust-Gläubigen, dazu bewog, seinen
Glauben zu hinterfragen und sich dem Revisionismus
zuzuwenden, obwohl er damit seine erfolgversprechende
Karriere als Wissenschaftler an einem
Max-Planck-Institut zerstörte. Zudem begründet er,
warum der Revisionismus wichtig ist, wieso er im
Gegensatz zur etablierten Holocaust-Forschung für sich
beanspruchen kann, wissenschaftlich zu sein, und warum
jede staatliche und gesellschaftliche Verfolgung der
Revisionisten menschenrechtswidrig ist.
Darüber hinaus enthält dieses Sammelwerk eine Reihe
von Beiträgen, in denen Rudolf nüchtern über die
selbst erlebte staatliche und gesellschaftliche
Verfolgung berichtet, über Strafprozesse,
Medien-Hetzkampagnen, gesellschaftliche Ausgrenzung
und die Vernichtung seiner bürgerlichen
Existenzgrundlage. Das Buch wird abgerundet durch
einen Überblick über Menschenrechtsverletzungen in
Deutschland. Neben einigen hervorstechenden Beispielen
der Verfolgung friedfertiger politischer und
historischer Dissidenten wird die rechtliche Grundlage
von Zensur und Verfolgung Andersdenkender in
Deutschland ebenso beschrieben wie die historische
Entwicklung der sich immer totalitärer gebärenden
deutschen Gesellschaft nachgezeichnet.
432 S ., DIN A5, pb., index (2005) , ISBN: 1902619099;
Listenpreis in Euro: € 20.

Aus obigem Buch als ergänzte Auszüge:
Diktatur Deutschland. Die Zerstörung von Demokratie
und Menschenrechten unter dem Einfluß von
Kriegspropaganda (2005, 64 Seiten)
http://www.vho.org/D/dd
Erinnern Sie sich, daß die zwischen 1949 und 1990
bestehende mitteldeutsche Diktatur den Namen “Deutsche
Demokratische Republik” trug? Fast alle Diktaturen
behaupten von sich, sie seien eine Demokratie. Aber
die Behauptung alleine genügt nicht, um diesem
Anspruch gerecht zu werden.
Ein Land, das uns durch Strafgesetze vorschreibt, wie
wir über entscheidende Phasen der Geschichte zu denken
haben, diktiert uns unter Gewaltandrohung unsere
Meinung. Dies ist eine Diktatur.
Ein Land, welches Historiker in Gefängnisse wirft, das
Singen friedlicher Lieder verbietet und
wissenschaftliche Bücher verbrennt, diktiert uns, wie
und was wir zu denken haben. Dies ist eine Diktatur.
Ein Land, das uns durch Strafgesetze vorschreibt,
taten- und widerspruchslos hinzunehmen, daß unser Land
von Armutsflüchtlingen aus aller Welt überschwemmt
wird, diktiert uns unter Gewaltandrohung unsere
Meinung und verweigert uns unser Völkerrecht auf
Selbstbestimmung. Dies ist eine Diktatur.
Ein Land, das Mitglieder oppositioneller Parteien
verfolgt, diktiert uns, welche Parteien wir wählen
dürfen und welche nicht. Dies ist eine Diktatur.
Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland ist eine Diktatur.
Wer es nicht glaubt: Diese Broschüre beweist es.
64 S ., DIN A5 broschürt (2005) , ISBN: 1591480183;
Listenpreis in Euro: € 8.

Eine Zensur findet statt! Redeverbote und
Bücherverbrennung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
(2005, 49 Seiten)
http://www.vho.org/D/ezfs
In der Bundesrepublik Deutschland werden politische
und wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen, die den
Machthabern nicht in den Kram passen, in
Müllverbrennungsanlagen verbrannt. Autoren,
Herausgeber, Verleger, Groß- und Einzelhändler und
jeder Kunde, der mehr als zwei Exemplare dieser
verbotenen Schriften oder Filme bestellt, wird
gnadenlos vor den Kadi gezerrt und zu Geld- oder gar
Gefängnisstrafen verurteilt.
Und um dem Ganzen die Kronen aufzusetzen, halten die
Zensurbehörden die Listen verbotener Schriften auch
noch geheim, so daß sich niemand unterrichten kann,
was er nicht kaufen und verbreiten oder gar
verschenken darf.
Dies alles geschieht nach dem folgenden perversen
Motto:
Weil Deutschland in der Vergangenheit Minderheiten
verfolgt, Dissidenten eingesperrt und Bücher verbrannt
hat, ist Deutschland heute verpflichtet, Minderheiten
zu verfolgen, Dissidenten einzusperren und Bücher zu
verbrennen!
Doch lesen Sie selbst!
48 S ., DIN A5, broschürt (Mai 2005) , ISBN:
1591480175; Listenpreis in Euro: € 6.

Holocaust Revisionismus. Eine kritische
geschichtswissenschaftliche Methode. (2005, 144
Seiten)
http://www.vho.org/D/hr
Dürfen wir Menschen zweifeln? Dürfen wir kritische
Fragen stellen? Ist es uns erlaubt, unvoreingenommen
nach Antworten zu suchen? Und dürfen wir die
Antworten, die wir nach besten Wissen und Gewissen
gefunden haben, unseren Mitmenschen mitteilen?
Der kritische, zweifelnde, nach Wahrheit suchende
Mensch ist ein Ideal unseres aufgeklärten Zeitalters
— sollte man meinen. Doch wenn es um den Holocaust
geht, also dem Schicksal der Juden im Machtbereich des
Dritten Reiches, dann ändert sich das schlagartig. Bei
diesem Thema wird uns mit brachialer Gewalt verboten
zu zweifeln. Das Strafgesetz schreibt uns ein
bestimmtes Geschichtsbild vor. Wer auf kritische
Fragen andere Antworten gibt, riskiert bis zu fünf
Jahre Gefängnis.
Die Armenier haben nichts dagegen, daß man kritisch
die Geschichte des Völkermordes untersucht, der im
Ersten Weltkrieg an ihnen begangen wurde. Die
Kosovo-Albaner freuen sich über jeden, der sich
kritisch mit der ethnischen Säuberung
auseinandersetzt, der sie nach 1990 zum Opfer fielen.
Alle möglichen Völkermorde der Menschheitsgeschichte
werden immer wieder gründlich untersucht. Nur mit dem
Holocaust an den Juden darf man sich nicht kritisch
befassen.
Dieses Buch zeigt, daß eine kritische
Auseinandersetzung mit der Geschichtsschreibung des
sogenannten Holocaust nicht nur legitim, sondern zudem
notwendig ist. Erst die kritische Wiederbetrachtung
(re-videre = Revision) der Beweislage kann Zweifel
ausräumen und Gewißheit schaffen. Erst die
Herausforderung durch kritische, zweifelnde Forscher
ermöglicht es, Fakten von Fiktion zu trennen und die
Starrheit dogmatischer Vorstellungen zu durchbrechen.
Der Holocaust-Revisionismus ist die einzige
geschichtswissenschaftliche Schule, die sich von
keiner Regierung und von keinem Staatsanwalt
vorschreiben läßt, wo sie nach Fakten zu suchen hat
und welche Ergebnisse sie zu verkünden hat. Der
Holocaust-Revisionismus ist daher die einzige wahrlich
unabhängige Methode zur Feststellung der Wahrheit.
144 S ., DIN A5, pb. (2005) , ISBN: 1591480191;
Listenpreis in Euro: € 10.

[END]

*******************************************************

Dr. Fredrick Toben:

http://www.adelaideinstitute.org

[START]

For the Record

Personal and public matters arising out of Ernst
Zündel imprisoned in Germany.

Is Revisionism in crisis as stimulated by Ernst
Zündel’s deportation from Canada to Germany?

By Fredrick Töben,

1. Should he or should he not contest the impossible
in a court of law where his guilt is already
established?

1.1 If he argues the case, then he will further
incriminate himself because in a German court of law
privilege does not attach itself to anything said in
court. Hence, any defence mounted by an accused will
merely compound the crime.

1.2 If he does contest the matter, then his trial
could become a massive propaganda trial that the
German and Jewish ‘Holocaust’ believers would not like
to see happen in Germany.

2.  German justice is capricious.

2.1 In matters of F Töben, 8, 10 November 1999, and
appeal 12 December 2000

2.2 In the first week of July 2003 I traveled from
Paris to Germany, and on 8 July, while having a
wee-wee break at an isolated forest spot, a police
patrol spotted me and checked my details, then took me
to the Pforzheim  Police Station where I was advised
that there is a European Arrest Warrant out for me.  I
advised the officers that had I known, then I would
not have entered Germany. Paris Airport did not stop
me and I had submitted my passport to them for
inspection. After a two hour wait at the police
station I was permitted to leave, which I did without
breaking the speed limit on a country road that took
me France.

2.3 Common law has the concept Legal Ambush –
something German law actually practices.

2.4 On my return home, on I wrote a letter to the
Bundeskriminal Amt (BKA) Wiesbaden, seeking
clarification about my ban from Germany. A reply from
the BKA, dated 22 October 2003, from a Mr Alfons
Wisser, stated that there was nothing against me and I
was free to travel to Germany.

2.4 On 12 April 2004, at Helsinki airport while
waiting for my plane to depart for Moscow, I was
advised by Finnish border police that I should not
have been permitted to enter the European Union, on
account of Germany having imposed a travel ban on me
that prevents me from entering the EU. It was dated 9
January 2004.

2.5 Upon returning home I again wrote to the BKA
Wiesbaden and requested an update of my status. A
letter, dated 22 June 2004, from Mr Alfons Wisser
confirmed that I had been banned from entering the EU,
on account of my having been arrested, which generated
the trial at Mannheim on 8 and 10  November 1999.

2.6 Judge Adam of the Landgericht Mannheim advised me
– via the Australian Attorney General’s office,
Canberra – that on 27 May 2004, he had issued a
Summons, setting down a trial date for 8, 9 and 11
November 2004. This was to be the re-trial as ordered
by the Karlsruhe Appeals Court on 12 December 2000.
Although I had indicated to Judge Adam that I was
quite prepared to come to Germany – but only if Horst
Mahler could be my  defence counsel (Mahler was
stripped of practicing law soon after by a Berlin
judge) I advise the presiding Judge that I am banned
from entering Germany.  On 8 November 2004 the judge
then abandoned the trial to give himself an
opportunity to check up on my claim that I was barred
from entering Germany, the European Union – something
that I had advertised on Adelaide Institute’s website.

2.7 In the second week of January 2005 I received an
undated letter from trial judge Adam that in a
judgment of 21 December 2004, of which I knew nothing,
I had forfeited my bail money of $6,000 because
according to his enquries there was no ban imposed on
my coming to Germany.

2.8 This astounded me – and so on 4 February 2005 I
wrote to the BKA Wiesbaden to have this matter
clarified. On 14 March 2005 I received a reply, dated
2 March 2005 – again from Alfons Wisser – stating that
there was nothing outstanding against me in either  in
the Schengen system nor in the German system, and that
I was free to travel to Germany. […Sie weder im
Schengener Informationssystem (SIS) noch im
(nationalen) Polizeilichen Informationssystem (INPOL)
zur Zurückweisung (Einreiseverbot) ausgeschrieben
sind.]

3. The BKA, Wiesbaden as an agent if conflicting
information.

3.1 I have again written to the BKA requesting
information when the ban, operational on 9 January
2004, was lifted. My claim that I could not come to
Germany for the re-trial has thereby been negated. I
should know when the ban on my entry to Germany was
lifted. It was operational on 9 January 2004, as
confirmed by the BKA as late as 22 June 2004, after
Judge Adam had issued the Summons of 27 May 2004 and
set the trial date for November 8, 9, 11 November
2004. Surely the still meticulous German bureaucracy
will have a date for me when, after 22 June 2004, the
ban on my entry to Germany was lifted – or is a
bureaucrat-politician fiddling the books so as to
entrap me, set a legal ambush for me? If this is the
case, then knowing the exactitude of the German
bureaucracy’s mindset, there will be a notation
somewhere that will point out where it is fiddling
with the books so as to legally entrap me.

3.2 What this chronology indicates is that there is
some kind of co-ordination between the judge and the
BKA that had the ban lifted so that the Judge could
make a judgment about the DM6,000, which should have
been returned to me. On 21 December 2004, Judges Adam,
Bültmann, Egerer decided to confiscate my bail, and I
was given a week in which to lodge an appeal. I
received the undated notification of the judgment per
mail in the second week in January 2005, and so it was
not possible to appeal against this judgment. However,
on 25 January 2005 I did send my objection to the
matter via the Australian Federal Police who sent the
matter per the Australian Attorney General’s office,
to Mannheim Court.

3.3 I had been assigned a court appointed defence
counsel, RA Wingerter, who to this day has not made
contact with me. I rang Judge Adam about it, and he
expressed surprise at his not contacting me. Judge
Adam thought that the counsel’s motion presented to
court on 8 November 2004, originated from me, i.e.
that I had a travel ban to the EU and that I was an
unwelcome visitor to Germany. I advised Judge Adam
that this court-appointed counsel has not spoken with
me, and that he must have received the information
presented to the judge from our website.

4. The ‘Holocaust’ is the issue.

4.1 After following the procedure used to get Ernst
Zündel to Germany – Judge Pierre Blaise literally
throwing all Canadian legal precedent overboard, after
the positive welcome Horst Mahler, et al, accorded
Ernst Zündel as a Prisoner of War in Germany, and
after reading Germar Rudolf’s Lectures on the
Holocaust, I find that this whole matter of the
‘Holocaust’ needs individuals who outright challenge
the legal fabric that is being spun around those who
refuse to believe in the ‘Holocaust’. There is an evil
force that attempts to silence  individuals who are
now considered Holocaust dissidents – individuals who
refuse to recant, who will claim outright  – as do
Professors Arthur Butz and Robert Faurisson – that the
‘Holcoaust’ is a lie.

4.2 Prof Arthur Butz in his book, The Hoax of the
Twentieth Century, stated at the end:

“In controversies to come the partisans of the
received legend will try mightily to confuse and
complicate the subject with all the tricks that we can
anticipate and perhaps then some. We have the
precedent of the Donation of Constantine controversy
showing that simple observations that establish the
wildly ahistorical nature of a reigning legend can get
smothered. Thus my most important advice to those who
enter the controversy is that they not lose sight of
the fact that he real bone of contention, the
extermination allegation, has been laid to rest beyond
peradventure by ordinary historical analysis. It
follows that the basic tactic of the defenders of the
legend, in controversies to come, will be to attempt
to make claims that cannot be tested by the normal
method of placing them as hypotheses in appropriate
historical context and seeing if they cohere … The
defenders of the legend are in an impossible position
here. They cannot concede Auschwitz without conceding
the whole issue, for the reason that there is no sort
of evidence they offer for the others that is also not
offered for Auschwitz. If the “confession’ of
Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höß is fanciful, then who
will believe the “confession” of Treblinka commandant
Franz Stangl? If the Auschwitz accounts of Rudolf Vrba
and Miklos Nyiszli are not credible, and their books
sick jokes, then who will believe the equally sick
Treblinka accounts of Jankiel Wiernik and other
obscure people? If the Nuremberg and postwar German
trials have not established the truth about Auschwitz,
then who will believe that they have established the
truth about Treblinka? If the large numbers of Jews
admittedly sent to Auschwitz were not killed there,
then who will believe that a large number of Jews sent
to Treblinka were killed at that camp. My advice,
then, to those who would engage in controversy is to
not permit the defenders of the legend to get away
with ignoring Auschwitz. The fact is that it is very
easy to bring down the legend as it applies to
Auschwitz and Auschwitz in turn, on account of the
nature of the evidence involved, brings down the rest
of the legend with it … All I can add is that one
should keep current with the revisionist literature
and the more important pieces of literature in support
of the legend and, in controversy, be mindful above
all of preserving historical context and perspective
and not getting trapped with myopic historical
vision.”

4.3 Prof Robert Faurisson stated:

“Show me or draw me a Nazi gas chamber! Stop giving me
words. Stop showing me a building, a door, a wall or,
sometimes, only hair or shoes. I need a full picture
of one of those fantastic chemical slaughterhouses. I
need a physical representation of the extraordinary
weapon of an unprecedented crime. If you dare to say
that what tourists are shown in some camps is, or was,
such a gas chamber, come on and say it.”

4.4 Germar Rudolf in his The Rudolf Report and
Lectures on the Holocaust stated: – read his books!

5. Remember, Galileo Galilei was vindicated over 300
years after the event – Ernst Zündel now sits in jail
and most individuals that would class themselves as
not believing in the ‘Holocaust’ lie, sit comfortably
at home grieving for Ernst, but doing nothing about
it, except claiming that they are wiser than Ernst,
and that they are not prepared to go to prison because
it is not worth it. Such individuals will
hedonistically feed their own needs with whatever
fancies them, but to protest on behalf of Ernst is
beneath their dignity – self sacrifice is not worth it
because it will not help Ernst in prison.

I am therefore again free to travel to Germany. Would
you go if you were me? Would you trust those Germans
who are involved in generating this kind of
information, and who also defend and protect the
‘Holocaust’  legend from rational scrutiny?

Any comments, please?

Fredrick Töben

Adelaide

14 March 2005

[END]

*******************************************************

Hans Mohr:

[START]

Dear Walter you ask “who is Eric Thomson”?
Regards HM.

>I was surprised and angered at the beginning when the
letter below arrived in my box. But, then I realized
that it is actually a good thing. It shows once more
that white supremacists eat their own. Anyway, who is
Eric Thomson? Someone fill me in! His letter is …..,
what the hell, judge for yourself:<

Eric Thomson was an American Army officer turned
CIA/DOD contracted killer for US hits in third world
countries. He did Army Intelligence grunt work, and
coordinated low level “wet affairs” for a very
substantially Jewish American run CIA. Sidney
Gottlieb’s MK Ultra CIA Mind Control Experiments, and
many other controversial CIA projects were staffed
almost exclusively by Jews, and this bothered Tom.

At that time, Eric resigned his US appointment in
protest. At that time (almost all officially US
sanctioned political murders in Europe, the Middle
East, and Africa were contracted out to the Mossad to
do the actual wet work) Eric apparently worked as a
supervising caseworker for US orchestrated hits.

After leaving Intelligence work he served in Africa,
South America and other countries as a soldier of
fortune. Eric still keeps mobile (perhaps to stay a
step ahead of the Mossad), but can apparently still be
found in Washington State.

Despite lots of harassment and physical attacks, Eric
still manages to get friends to post his ideas, and
historical debates.

The behavior of the “Wedgies”, as described by the
author, is exactly the same as that described of jews
in The Old Testament. The origin of “Hebrew” is Habiru
Sagaz or Desert Cutthroats. I do not believe that
Whites are “the true Desert Cutthroats, i.e.
Israelites”. Neither Hebrew nor Aramaic, the language
allegedly spoken by the legendary Jesus, are
Indo-European languages. I am a White man and truth
exists, whether I happen to like it or not. Jesus’
actual words, as taken from the King James Bible,
which I have copied, suffice to tell me that Jesus has
no message for me. Why should he? I am not an
Israelite, nor, most likely, are you. Any way, that is
my final word on Christianity, which I deem to be a
racket, and which Dr. Oliver later concluded was the
moral equivalent of AIDS in regard to White survival.
Harrell informed me that the obvious contradictions
were purposely written into the Bible and the Koran,
so that the believer would have to go to a priest or
rabbi or mullah in order to have them “explained”, for
a fee, of course! The reason that Christianity was
dumped in Arabia, where it originated, by most Arabs,
is that its missionaries went west and incorporated
lots of western pagan beliefs, such as sun worship and
solstice celebrations like Yule and Easter. The Myth
of the Hanged God is also quite pagan, that is,
pre-Christian, along with the goddess-like role of
“The Mother of God” or “The Queen of Heaven’, alias
The Virgin Mary. Even Dagon got his due in the form of
the mitres worn by “Christian” popes and bishops.
Christianity is “catholic” in that its holy hokum
hucksters added ‘something for everyone’ to gain
addled adherents. As Christianity went north and west,
it became more Germanic. As it goes south, into Black
Africa, it became more voodooistic. Arab Christians
are ‘purer’ Christians, since they are more Semitic in
their doctrines. Moslems tell me that Christians have
a reputation for bathophobia: a fear of soap and
water, similar to the jews of Europe. A Moslem
ritually washes his feet before entering a mosque,
while Christians use “holy water” very sparingly. As
Christianity infected Rome, people stopped bathing.
Church officials described lice as “pearls of God”,
similar to East European jews who say they bring “good
luck”. Your argument is not with me, but with 99.99%
of those who call themselves “Christians”. That is
where your labor lies. U.S. diplomat, Ralph Townsend,
observed that the Christian missionaries in China
could not present the Chinese with any sort of
doctrinal or ritual unity, so the Chinese were rarely
impressed by the religion, but by the THINGS the
missionaries possessed, that the Chinese
“rice-Christians” lacked. As for paying hypocritical
lip-service to piety, virtue and fairness, the Chinese
are past masters of the art of pretty words without
substance. “You velly good talkee!” was their
compliment to the Christians’ holy hucksters and
messiah merchants. Christians have changed with the
times, but Chinese have not.
In regard to racial features, slanted eyes have
nothing to do with the color or lack thereof, of one’s
eyebrows. Whiteness of skin is insufficient to ‘prove’
that one is a true White, for I have seen
pale-skinned, blond, blue-eyed specimens with
otherwise negroid features. Remember Jimmy Carter?
Even one non-White racial characteristic indicates
mongrelization. Pro-White mongrels et al. are welcome
to join The Anti-Zionist Alliance, but they would not
qualify as members’ of The White Power Movement.

I don’t know that Hans Schmidt thinks of himself as a
“big shot” in regard to knowledge. He has obviously
done quite a lot of important research, and the
sources he quotes in his cogent book, “End Times/End
Games” are not items he dreamed up on his own.

I agree that those who claim to have “lots of jewish
friends” bear watching, with great vigilance. As for
“working together for goals”, we must first agree on
who we are, and what goals deserve our efforts. I see
no such unity of identity or purpose. Hoffmann is
immersing himself in Judaism to the extent that he may
become a rabbi. Stay tuned!

The Yule season in retail business is the busiest time
of year, so that is the worst time for me in regard to
visiting, nor do I have transportation, and I must
update my internal travel documents in order to use
public transportation, thanks be to ZOG. My wishes to
you for a Good Yule and Happy New Year must suffice.
As for ‘living on love’ to raise a family in a cash
economy, let’s get real. In my experience, those who
engage in religious discussions are like those who
discuss “the meaning of life” incessantly. As long as
they discuss these things, they are not living. My
religion is my lifework. It requires no wordy
doctrines, nor multiple ‘interpretations’. I despise
Judaism in all its forms, so I do not wish to behave
like a talmud yid in “shul”.

[END]

Monika:

[START]

http://www.faem.com/

http://www.martinlindstedt.org/et060904.html

[END]

*******************************************************

From M:

[START]

Far right in Germany fuels rising concern
By Richard Bernstein The New York Times
Monday, March 14, 2005

MÜCKA, Germany Neo-Nazis, as they are commonly called
in Germany, are not having an easy time in Mücka, a
small town in the state of Saxony, where the main
far-right political party held a roundtable for local
people Saturday. The purpose, as one of the rightist
leaders put it, was to get closer to the people and
“talk to each other rather than about each other.”

The members of the group, the National Democratic
Party, had a chance to present their views, but they
took a few shots in the process. One member of the
audience, a supporter of the reformed Communist Party
here in what used to be East Germany, told the
assembled far-rightists that their party was
indistinguishable from the Nazis of old, who made war
on Germany’s neighbors and slaughtered millions.

A woman in a red jacket made an impassioned speech.
She agreed with the NPD that the mainstream parties
were not taking care of the needs of ordinary people,
but, she said, she would never vote for them, never.

“If you came into power, it would mean war for
Germany,” the woman said. “I don’t understand why the
court in Karlsruhe didn’t ban you.”

The reference was to the country’s Supreme Court,
which rejected a government effort to ban the NPD a
couple of years ago.

Under normal circumstances, a meeting like the one
under a klieg-light scaffolding in the Wodan
discotheque in Mücka would hardly have been a
newsworthy event, but several German newspaper
reporters were there Saturday, along with a national
television station, an indicator that Germany’s far
right has been making its presence known, in Saxony
and, lately, even nationally.

Last fall, the NPD got 9.2 percent of the vote in
local Saxon elections, which gave them a block of 10
seats in the state Parliament. That has gotten the
party noticed. The Green Party members of the Saxon
Parliament notice the NPD by turning their backs
whenever one of the party’s members takes the floor.

A few weeks ago, NPD members walked out of the
parliamentary chamber during a ceremony to honor the
victims of Auschwitz, saying they would honor only
German victims of the war. Shortly after that, the
party staged a march in Dresden, the state capital, on
the 60th anniversary of the Allied bombing of the
city, which they referred to as a “Holocaust by
bombs.”

Recently, the NPD announced a plan to march past
Berlin’s Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe as
its way of marking the 60th anniversary of the end of
World War II in Germany, coming this May. The national
government responded by enacting new legislation that
effectively bans far-right demonstrations at Holocaust
memorial sites.

And now here in Mücka, where, having gotten 18 percent
of the vote in the election last fall, the NPD seems
to be trying to create a kind of stronghold, a center
of regular activities among a local population, one
that is economically depressed and disillusioned with
the centrist parties, that they hope will support them
in ever greater numbers.

Still, it might be seen as alarmist to worry about the
NPD’s ever coming to power in Saxony, much less in
Germany as a whole. Despite the country’s continuing
economic woes, with unemployment at levels that have
not been reached since the years when Hitler and the
Nazis came to power, there is little fear that history
is going to repeat itself.

Most experts see the support for the NPD in places
like Mücka as a classic gesture of protest and not a
show of yearning for a restoration of the Third Reich.
In a recent legislative election in the northern state
of Schleswig-Holstein, the NPD, though it campaigned
briskly, got about 2 percent of the vote.

And yet, even the NPD’s opponents, who are the vast
majority in Saxony, acknowledge that the group’s
leaders have skillfully used their new position in the
State Parliament to gain a platform for their views,
even as they have been clever in places like Mücka in
their efforts to disarm local opposition.

A few months ago, the party held a large fair in Mücka
that attracted close to 7,000 far-rightists from
across Germany, including crowds of skinheads, another
far-right group linked to the NPD but separate from
it.

“I went house to house to talk to people at the time
of the festival,” Mücka’s mayor, Holger Theurich, said
in an interview at his home before the NPD roundtable
began. “At the time, most people were worried about
it. People refused to work there even though they
could have used the money.”

“But then the NPD succeeded in creating a good image
as a party,” Theurich said, “and the same people who
were afraid in the beginning were saying, ‘These
people are O.K.”‘ There was no violence, no
intimidation, not a cigarette butt was left behind,
Theurich added, almost admiring of the party’s care to
create a good impression.

After the fair, the NPD started holding regular
concerts at the Wodan Discotheque. “Singing and
dancing for Germany,” the events were called, with
live performances by one of Germany’s several
far-right bands. These events meant that Mücka became
the scene of an almost weekly influx of skinheads and
others, and Theurich and others in the town decided
that they had to respond.

They organized a public roundtable where an academic
expert on the far right presented information on the
NPD. Some NPD members showed up at the meeting and, as
one participant at the meeting put it, they threatened
to hijack the event to present their own point of
view, which led Theurich to end the meeting early.

Then, at a concert a couple of weeks ago, when a
scuffle broke out between party supporters and some
television cameramen, about 200 police officers
arrived and broke up the concert – an event portrayed
by the NPD as a violation of their democratic rights
of peaceful assembly and free speech.

That set the stage for the roundtable Saturday at the
Wodan, aimed at persuading local people that the party
was the victim of dictatorial oppression by the German
government, which represented the interests of
international capital and globalization. Their message
was: We are the ones who care about the German people,
and we are not going to spend the national treasure
subsidizing cheap foreign laborers when German workers
cannot find jobs.

It was hard to judge the reception the NPD got. There
was agreement with it that the mainstream parties have
no program to deal with Germany’s unemployment, which
in Mücka is about 25 percent, and the NPD members who
spoke seemed quite professorial, even if what they
said did not persuade everybody.

“Your closeness to National Socialism is obvious,”
said Bernard Sass, a former Communist. “You cannot
deny this. The Nazi regime was a regime that committed
crimes, and you have to expect that people like you
who are close to them are going to be watched.”

[END]

*******************************************************

Mike Reisch:

[START]

Dear Walter:

It is remarkable but the most dangerous place for an
unborn child is in the womb of a mother residing in
the US or the industrialized nations.

The irony is that these same nations boast of having
superior pre natal health care unrivaled anywhere on
the globe.

Mike Reisch.

[END]

*******************************************************

Fritz:

[START]

Walter,

I’m forwarding what ought to concern us all.  Take a
look at how Capitalism really works:

Fritz

America’s has a debt problem it cannot solve. You may
have missed it. But there it was on the front page of
the USA Today recently.

$84,454 – average household personal debt
$473,456 – YOUR share of America’s unpaid Social
Security and Medicare promises
$53 TRILLION – Total federal, state, local, corporate,
and personal debt in the United States
That’s right. America’s total debt is nearly 400%
larger than GDP. It’s a whole fictional economy of
false prosperity. The more you look, the worse it
gets…

The U.S. government is operating with a $521 billion
deficit
The trade deficit (the difference between what we buy
from foreigners and what we sell to them) is clocking
in at a record $600 billion too!
And Americans themselves are in credit card debt to
the tune of $2 trillion – $6,788.68 for every man,
woman and child in the country
Of course, this may sound like old news. Economists
have been warning about the mounting debt for years.

In December 1997, the Consumer Federation of America
(CFA) urged lenders to limit credit lines to 20% of a
household’s income. Michael Sivy wrote about the U.S.
debt problem in the January 2000 issue of Time Europe
magazine. In October 2003, Justin Lahart of CNN/Money
said,”The consumer debt bubble in the United States
could make the stock bubble seem like nothing.”

The worrying continued into 2004. In January the
International Monetary Fund warned that U.S. fiscal
deficits “pose significant risks for the rest of the
world.”

And in June, Bill Gross, chief investment officer at
Pimco told the Financial Times, “Too much debt,
geopolitical risk and several bubbles have created a
very unstable environment which can turn any minute.”

Note:  Warren Buffett  …clearly believes that the
most likely outlook for the U.S. economy is dollar
deflation, perhaps severely so. Think about this:
Berkshire Hathaway has decreased its position in U.S.
government paper by more than 80% to $1.6 billion
since the beginning of 2002, while its foreign bond
holdings have increased several-fold to $7.1 billion.
http://www.fool.com/news/commentary/2005/commentary05030901.htm?source=eptyholnk303100&logvisit=y&npu=y

[END]

*******************************************************

BOOKS FOR SALE:

AVAILABLE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY NEWS LIBRARY:

* RICHARD ODORFER – THE SOUL OF GERMANY – HARD COVER
WITH GOLD IMPRINT – $30.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)

* UDO WALENDY – FORGED WAR CRIMES MALIGN THE GERMAN
NATION – $12.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)

* CHRISTINE B. MILLER – REALITY CHECK – SOFT COVER –
$10.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* WALTER F. MUELLER – REVISIONIST RESOURCE GUIDE –
$8.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* ERNST ZUNDEL – SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT – LETTERS
FROM CELL #7 – SOFT COVER – $6.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* JOHN RAWLINGS/MICHAEL PASSMORE (GERMAN TRANSLATION
GUENTHER DECKERT) – THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
NUEREMBERG RALLIES – SOFT COVER – BLACK/WHITE &
COLOR(COFFEE TABLE SIZE) – $ 35.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* SPECIAL EDITION – THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
NUREMBERG RALLIES (THE HOFFMANN RALLY CARDS) – SOFT
COVER – COLOR – $ 12.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

To order, please send a check or money order to:

Community News
PO Box 191677
Sacramento, CA 95819

or e-mail us and we will send you an e-mail bill
through PayPal.

 

Walter F. Mueller
“The truth is back in business”

The “Patriot Letter” is a free news service of
Community News, a monthly publication with a
circulation of 20,000. To subscribe to Community News
please e-mail for more information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *