0

Stay away from SSDVPS

Hi all,

I just wanted to send out a little “warning” about SSDVPS(dot)com. I have had active services with this company since 2013…however, a few days ago I noticed my services were not responding, so I went to check the issue. It said they had terminated my services due to non-payment: which is of course not true, as I always pay my bills.

Here is the exchange I had with them about it:

SSDVPS

Well, as a response: how about SUSPENDING the client instead of terminating the VPS, to begin with? Terminate the VPS only at last resort. That is more sane and more so considering that you rely on shitty IPN, or whatever.

Anyway, I’m done with them and can now use the money elsewhere. A plus for SSDVPS is that they did in fact refund me – something I thought they would object against. So kudos for that, anyway.

0

I Love Speed.

Well, it’s true friends. I do love speed — particularly the type of speed provided by Atlantic.Net

k0nsl-i-love-speed01

The postal services appear to have handled the package as if it contained a WMD…

About Atlantic.Net

Atlantic.Net was formed in 1994 and has strategically evolved into a market-leading Cloud Hosting Provider. Atlantic.Net is recognized for providing exceptional business hosting service, simplifying complex technologies, and building a brand that businesses trust since 1994.

Atlantic.Net Hosting Solutions specializes in providing Cloud Servers, Colocation, Dedicated Servers and Virtualization Hosting Services. We own and operate our world-class data center operations in Dallas Texas, Toronto Canada, and Orlando Florida and are dedicated to implementing tailored hosting solutions that enable you to enjoy the benefits of cost savings.

0

RunAbove Sandbox

RunAbove RunAbove

A quick draft with results for my RunAbove Cloud Sandbox. The description of the RunAbove service is as follows:

For developer, by developers.
RunAbove has been created by the OVH Group. We want to change the way you look at Cloud Computing Services.

Based on a new vision of Cloud Computing Services, RunAbove is the first mono-slot provider in the world.
We focus on ensuring the best performance in terms of I/O, network throughput, CPU and RAM.
RunAbove aims to provide a cloud infrastructure powerful and transparent, for developers all over the world so they can focus on their work by relying on unshakable resources.
Unshakable resources!

RunAbove is a $10 million investment

The ‘Cloud Sandbox’ instances have no SLA (last time I checked) but my experience since I signed up has been stable and the network has been good as well. I also have a Power8 instance, but have not had any time to play with it much – not yet!

[slider crop=”yes” slide1=”/blog/k1/uploads/2014/11/k0nsl-RunAbove-Power8.png” slide2=”/blog/k1/uploads/2014/11/k0nsl-RunAbove-Power8_02.png” slide3=”/blog/k1/uploads/2014/11/k0nsl-RunAbove-Power8_03.png”][/slider]

The RunAbove panel looks like this in “simple”-mode:
RunAbove-Simple-Panel01_k0nsl

Here are my initial results for the ‘Cloud Sandbox’ instance.

Specs
RAM: 4 GB
HDD: 60 GB
CPU Model: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
CPU Cores: 1
CPU Speed: 3699 MHz
CPU Cache: 4096 KB
UnixBench
UnixBench (w/ all processors): 2111.6
UnixBench (w/ one processor): 2101.9
IOPS
ioping -c 10
request=1 time=0.3 ms
request=2 time=0.3 ms
request=3 time=0.4 ms
request=4 time=0.3 ms
request=5 time=0.3 ms
request=6 time=0.4 ms
request=7 time=0.3 ms
request=8 time=0.4 ms
request=9 time=0.4 ms
request=10 time=0.4 ms

10 requests completed in 9004.4 ms, 2921 iops, 11.4 mb/s
FIO
FIO random reads:
randomreads: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
fio-2.0.9
Starting 1 process
randomreads: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)

randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=6772: Tue Nov  4 13:45:11 2014
  read : io=1024.3MB, bw=258970KB/s, iops=64742 , runt=  4050msec
  cpu          : usr=13.63%, sys=56.71%, ctx=8246, majf=0, minf=85
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
   READ: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=258969KB/s, minb=258969KB/s, maxb=258969KB/s, mint=4050msec, maxt=4050msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  vda: ios=258939/0, merge=0/0, ticks=167744/0, in_queue=167596, util=97.07%
Done

FIO random writes:
randomwrites: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
fio-2.0.9
Starting 1 process

randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=6778: Tue Nov  4 13:45:48 2014
  write: io=1024.3MB, bw=29081KB/s, iops=7270 , runt= 36066msec
  cpu          : usr=1.91%, sys=10.87%, ctx=169674, majf=0, minf=19
  IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=0/w=262207/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=29080KB/s, minb=29080KB/s, maxb=29080KB/s, mint=36066msec, maxt=36066msec

Disk stats (read/write):
  vda: ios=0/261361, merge=0/28, ticks=0/2469688, in_queue=2471032, util=99.78%
Done
Download Speed
Cachefly: 16.1 MB/s
Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA: 15.0 MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX, USA: 12.0 MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP: 5.97 MB/s
Linode, London, UK: 83.9 MB/s
OVH, Paris, France: 62.5 MB/s
SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands: 40.6 MB/s
Hetzner, Nuernberg, Germany: 17.2 MB/s
iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia: 742 KB/s
MammothVPS, Sydney, Australia: 432 KB/s
Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 51.4 MB/s
Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA: 8.39 MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore: 2.52 MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA: 9.44 MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA: 8.81 MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA: 15.6 MB/s
Colormedia Benchmark
Colormedia Benchmark Version 6.2 (with CPU Benchmark)
Webseite [1]: www.colormedia.co
Webseite [2]: www.ensky.eu

Allgemeine Informationen

Prozessor :  Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge)
Prozessor-Kerne :  1
Taktfrequenz pro Kern:  3699.986 MHz
Arbeitsspeicher : 3968 MB
SWAP : 0 MB
Laufzeit :   4 days, 16:16,

Netzwerk Benchmark

Download Geschwindigkeit:  colormedia (DE):
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Edis (AT): 25.5MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Netcologne (DE): 41.2MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  FSIT (CH): 60.5MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Softlayer (Hong Kong): 4.31MB/s

Festplatten Benchmark

I/O Performance [1]:  250 MB/s
I/O Performance [2]:  241 MB/s
I/O Performance [3]:  222 MB/s

CPU Benchmark

real    0m10.609s
user    0m10.557s
sys     0m0.016s

admin@with-jews-you-lose:~$
PetaByet Benchmark

Speedtest.net

RunAbove-Speedtest01_k0nsl

RunAbove-Speedtest02_k0nsl

RunAbove-Speedtest03_k0nsl

The End

That’s it for now. As with any other provider, one must give it several months before reaching a conclusion. But if you wish to give RunAbove a test, go ahead. I have not been disappointed by anything so far!

0

Benchmark of Berry Servers

Berry Servers Berry Servers

Hi friends,

I reckon, most people who know the k0nsl, they also know I’m a sucker for new stuff, right? Well…not in a material sense, of course! I could care less for any material things. But back to “Berry Servers”: when they launched their VPS line I almost hit the order button instantly, at the prospect of getting a few more cheap IRC nodes + new nodes for DNS clustering, but I kept trying to resist it, telling myself I’ve no use for more…fruitless! I was only able to resist for one day before I finally ordered one. Yes, it was weak of me.
I am the first person to admit that

Berry Servers offers very cheap yearly VPS Hosting in Phoenix, Arizona.

At any rate, I am currently testing their ‘Blueberry’-plan — which they upgraded to a “Dewberry” in the end (only the memory was upgraded, IIRC)

The brief introduction would be the following blob:

Berry Servers is owned and run by Epidrive Webhosting Solutions. Berry Servers’ main goal is to provide reliable and affordable VPS servers. All our plans include best effort support and 99% uptime guarantee. Stocks are limited so get yours while you still can.

A few generic results are in order. I will update this with more replete information on Thursday or Friday, as I’ve got very little time for this right now..

PetaByet Benchmark

Traceroute

BuyVM:

root@berry:~# traceroute survivor.k0nsl.org
traceroute to survivor.k0nsl.org (209.141.38.163), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  107.158.245.234 (107.158.245.234)  0.029 ms  0.008 ms  0.007 ms
 2  104.140.0.101 (104.140.0.101)  45.579 ms  45.574 ms  45.565 ms
 3  104.140.0.57 (104.140.0.57)  0.296 ms  0.339 ms  0.332 ms
 4  ae1-207.phx10.ip4.gtt.net (46.33.80.65)  0.370 ms  0.365 ms  0.402 ms
 5  xe-3-3-2.lax21.ip4.gtt.net (141.136.106.85)  34.581 ms xe-1-2-3.lax21.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.187.110)  11.294 ms  11.293 ms
 6  pni-as3257-1-lax2.staminus.net (69.197.1.66)  9.243 ms  9.241 ms  9.227 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  node16.buyvm.net (205.185.112.116)  19.621 ms  19.562 ms  19.460 ms
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *
root@berry:~#

The IP below is not mine, that’s an abuser from Vultr:

root@berry:~# traceroute 108.61.155.154
traceroute to 108.61.155.154 (108.61.155.154), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  107.158.245.234 (107.158.245.234)  0.023 ms  0.005 ms  0.004 ms
 2  104.140.0.93 (104.140.0.93)  2.035 ms  2.032 ms  2.027 ms
 3  104.140.0.57 (104.140.0.57)  0.263 ms  0.308 ms  0.302 ms
 4  10ge16-6.core1.phx2.he.net (216.218.230.253)  3.035 ms  3.082 ms  3.120 ms
 5  10ge15-3.core1.dal1.he.net (184.105.222.78)  25.402 ms  20.299 ms  25.395 ms
 6  10ge12-6.core1.chi1.he.net (184.105.213.118)  47.994 ms  47.994 ms  47.987 ms
 7  100ge5-2.core1.nyc4.he.net (184.105.223.162)  58.819 ms  84.483 ms  58.859 ms
 8  10ge5-1.core1.nyc6.he.net (184.105.222.82)  72.520 ms  72.966 ms  72.735 ms
 9  nyiix.gi3-6.cr1.nyc1.choopa.net (198.32.160.157)  60.157 ms  72.669 ms  59.931 ms
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *
root@berry:~#

This IP is not mine either — It’s a Chinese abuser:

root@berry:~# traceroute 103.24.229.4
traceroute to 103.24.229.4 (103.24.229.4), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  107.158.245.234 (107.158.245.234)  0.043 ms  0.006 ms  0.005 ms
 2  104.140.0.105 (104.140.0.105)  948.792 ms  948.790 ms  948.784 ms
 3  104.140.0.57 (104.140.0.57)  0.227 ms  0.263 ms  0.257 ms
 4  ae1-207.phx10.ip4.gtt.net (46.33.80.65)  0.369 ms  0.364 ms  0.357 ms
 5  xe-8-3-0.lax20.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.182.181)  11.201 ms  11.235 ms  11.230 ms
 6  219.158.33.49 (219.158.33.49)  122.842 ms  121.267 ms  121.303 ms
 7  219.158.102.177 (219.158.102.177)  299.051 ms  299.062 ms  299.057 ms
 8  219.158.19.201 (219.158.19.201)  304.397 ms  304.334 ms  304.384 ms
 9  219.158.96.229 (219.158.96.229)  273.640 ms  273.623 ms  273.664 ms
10  219.158.101.117 (219.158.101.117)  188.084 ms  186.340 ms  186.946 ms
11  219.158.8.186 (219.158.8.186)  207.012 ms  206.527 ms *
12  202.99.116.198 (202.99.116.198)  188.781 ms  189.053 ms  189.634 ms
13  117.8.1.186 (117.8.1.186)  258.497 ms *  258.658 ms
14  61.136.63.94 (61.136.63.94)  222.683 ms  223.167 ms  223.155 ms
15  103.24.229.4 (103.24.229.4)  254.300 ms  253.773 ms  255.354 ms
root@berry:~#

Traceroute to INIZ:

traceroute to 162.217.250.2 (162.217.250.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  107.158.245.234 (107.158.245.234)  0.039 ms  0.007 ms  0.006 ms
 2  * * *
 3  104.140.0.57 (104.140.0.57)  0.215 ms  0.260 ms  0.254 ms
 4  ae1-207.phx10.ip4.gtt.net (46.33.80.65)  0.338 ms  0.374 ms  0.321 ms
 5  xe-10-1-0.nyc20.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.184.226)  64.426 ms  64.471 ms  64.468 ms
 6  inforelay-gw.ip4.gtt.net (216.221.158.250)  64.543 ms  71.626 ms  71.613 ms
 7  cr1.lga2.inforelay.net (69.169.80.60)  61.331 ms  61.346 ms  61.385 ms
 8  cr1.lga2.ir.iniz.com (69.169.84.218)  62.114 ms  62.178 ms  62.223 ms
 9  nyc-vz1.iniz.com (162.220.240.2)  61.222 ms  61.091 ms  60.987 ms
10  nyc-us.lg.iniz.com (162.217.250.2)  61.798 ms  61.766 ms  61.998 ms
Shoahbench

 ____  _                 _     _                     _
/ ___|| |__   ___   __ _| |__ | |__   ___ _ __   ___| |__
\___ \| '_ \ / _ \ / _` | '_ \| '_ \ / _ \ '_ \ / __| '_ \
 ___) | | | | (_) | (_| | | | | |_) |  __/ | | | (__| | | |
|____/|_| |_|\___/ \__,_|_| |_|_.__/ \___|_| |_|\___|_| |_|

Kommandant: root
----------------------------------------------------------------
Crematory :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1231 v3 @ 3.40GHz
Furnace frequency :  3399.807 MHz
Cremation capacity : 128 MB
Number of muffles : 1
Baggage storage facilitation :  149 MB/s
Swampiness : 0
Country: Narnia
Interned for :   16:42,
----------------------------------------------------------------
Virtual cattle car speed from CacheFly: 78.3MB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 6.10MB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 57.9MB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 13.7MB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 8.26MB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 839KB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 10.6MB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 59.4MB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 80.4MB/s
Virtual cattle car speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 30.2MB/s
Survival chance: 4681%
root@berry:~#
Colormedia Benchmark
Colormedia Benchmark Version 6.2 (with CPU Benchmark)
Webseite [1]: www.colormedia.co
Webseite [2]: www.ensky.eu

Allgemeine Informationen

Prozessor :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1231 v3 @ 3.40GHz
Prozessor-Kerne :  1
Taktfrequenz pro Kern:  3399.807 MHz
Arbeitsspeicher : 128 MB
SWAP : 0 MB
Laufzeit :   1 day, 1:44,

Netzwerk Benchmark

Download Geschwindigkeit:  colormedia (DE): 4.79MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Edis (AT): 742KB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Netcologne (DE): 5.33MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  FSIT (CH): 7.11MB/s
Download Geschwindigkeit:  Softlayer (Hong Kong): 12.7MB/s

Festplatten Benchmark

I/O Performance [1]:  157 MB/s
I/O Performance [2]:  161 MB/s
I/O Performance [3]:  162 MB/s

CPU Benchmark

real    0m9.607s
user    0m9.598s
sys     0m0.000s


root@berry:~#
The End

I’ll run the “Shoahbench” on it when I’ve done more tweaks to the script + more [UPDATE: this has now been added, see above]. Right now I’m going to sit back a few months to evaluate their offering. As I always do.
So far nothing out of the ordinary save for a mishap on launch. Not a big deal. They fixed it and my service is working fine so far.

You can give “Berry Servers” a try and see what you think of their service by clicking here.

Adieu!

2

Backupsy — a month later!

Backupsy CP Backupsy CP

I’ve been with Backupsy for about one month now, I started my service with them at 09/14/2014 and up until now everything has been functioning as expected; no issues. The recent emergency maintenance which subsequently meant moving the node to another rack meant nothing, it all seamlessly went past me without any hiccups.

The only thing which really matters to me is the network connectivity (which has been fine). I am using Syncthing [2] to syncronise backups across several machines.

Here are a few benchmarks to compare to my previous benchmark [1] over one month ago. If you are looking for a solid provider for backing up your data, you might want to give this company a try — I’m not disappointed

Speedtest.net Benchmark

backupsy-speedtest-a-month-later01_k0nsl

backupsy-speedtest-a-month-later02_k0nsl

backupsy-speedtest-a-month-later03_k0nsl

Cachefly wget

Screenshot:

backupsy-cachefly-a-month-later01_k0nsl

Raw text:

root@backup51:~# wget cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test -O /dev/urandom
--2014-10-25 12:00:41--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `/dev/urandom'

100%[====================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 50.7M/s   in 2.0s

2014-10-25 12:00:43 (50.7 MB/s) - `/dev/urandom' saved [104857600/104857600]
Traceroute
root@backup51:~# traceroute survivor.k0nsl.org
traceroute to survivor.k0nsl.org (209.141.38.163), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  162.213.193.65 (162.213.193.65)  1.641 ms  1.624 ms  2.609 ms
 2  r1-side-from-bc1.inceronetwork.com (192.211.63.5)  0.225 ms  0.234 ms  0.218 ms
 3  ae15.cr2.dfw1.us.as4436.gtt.net (198.47.104.73)  0.767 ms  0.755 ms  0.714 ms
 4  ae10-208.dal33.ip4.gtt.net (173.241.130.153)  0.723 ms  0.704 ms  0.710 ms
 5  xe-10-2-0.nyc39.ip4.gtt.net (89.149.181.197)  41.410 ms  41.386 ms  41.395 ms
 6  * * *
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  node16.buyvm.net (205.185.112.116)  76.543 ms  75.906 ms  76.061 ms
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *
root@backup51:~# traceroute pcloud.com
traceroute to pcloud.com (74.120.8.14), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  162.213.193.65 (162.213.193.65)  2.096 ms  2.088 ms  2.113 ms
 2  r1-side-from-bc1.inceronetwork.com (192.211.63.5)  0.242 ms  0.257 ms  0.249 ms
 3  ae0.er2.dfw2.us.above.net (208.185.52.201)  0.871 ms  0.866 ms  0.875 ms
 4  above-telia.dfw2.us.above.net (64.125.12.46)  0.800 ms  0.814 ms  0.807 ms
 5  62.115.9.102 (62.115.9.102)  172.141 ms  172.148 ms  172.145 ms
 6  api8.pcloud.com (74.120.8.14)  0.740 ms  0.610 ms  0.596 ms
dd test

Screenshot:

backupsy-dd-a-month-later01_k0nsl

Raw text:

root@backup51:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=8k conv=fdatasync && rm -rf test
8192+0 records in
8192+0 records out
134217728 bytes (134 MB) copied, 0.350515 s, 383 MB/s
PetaByet Benchmark

References
  1. https://k0nsl.org/blog/backupsy-basic-tests/
  2. Open Source Continuous File Synchronization http://discourse.syncthing.net/
  3. Sign up with Backupsy! https://backupsy.com/aff.php?aff=327
0

BuyVM ‘lv-node16’: basic tests

BuyVM's Stallion BuyVM's Stallion

A few basic/generic tests on BuyVM’s ‘lv-node16’ after their upgrade to E5-2630L CPUs. I don’t have any comparisons because I lost the previous benchmark results, somehow. Very sloppy of me

For me, the only interesting results are the UnixBench [1] numbers.

UnixBench

UnixBench (w/ all processors): 1620.4
UnixBench (w/ one processor): 989.7

PetaByet Benchmark

ServerBear Benchmark

See: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2014/10/13/6KaC0hEFajDpHQZW

Get your own BuyVM VPS

I can just as well whore out my affiliate link for this superb company, here you go: https://my.frantech.ca/aff.php?aff=781

You won’t regret doing business with those guys

References
0

Backupsy – basic tests

Backupsy Backupsy

I’ve been using Backupsy (https://backupsy.com/) for backing up some of my data and their service has been good for me, so far. I have nothing to complain about from my own experience this far!

Here’s some basic tests:

PetaByet Benchmark

Speedtest.net Test

backupsy-speedtest04_k0nsl

backupsy-speedtest03_k0nsl

backupsy-speedtest02_k0nsl

backupsy-speedtest01_k0nsl

Disk Benchmark

Yes…I know – “dd”, ahem. But this is a quick and dirty test to just get the basics out there

backupsy-dd01_k0nsl

Conclusion

So far — for me personally — they’ve been providing a service that is not only cheap, but one that is reliable and has good connectivity with what I’m using it for. I can recommend Backupsy if you need a place to backup your data.
[tweet_dis]Sign up with Backupsy, here: https://backupsy.com/. A solid provider.[/tweet_dis]

That is all.