0

Anna Thomas of the Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation in 2006

auschwitz-jewish-center-foundation01_k0nsl

In 2006 I was contacted by Anna Thomas from the Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation (AJC) through my now defunct ‘Holocaust History Archive’ web page. For what reason, you ask? She requested my services.
I’m unable to find a profile on her or even a photograph. But I strongly suspect (on circumstantial evidence, I might add) that she is Anna Chłopek, a volunteer at the Auschwitz Jewish Center — very young, in her middle twenties, or some such, it is difficult to guess it. She could be close to my age. I cannot find any Anna Thomas from the AJC so this girl probably did the old ‘change the name trick’ when sending me the e-mail (which was sent from a contact form on my site); but despite her little trick, I’m almost convinced she’s Anna Chłopek. If she isn’t, then I’m sorry for the mistake. Perhaps one could call the Anna Thomas? Try 212.575.1050, that’s not a number in Poland, so perhaps I am wrong. What’s more, and this is the real hoot, her surname ‘Chłopek’, when translated into English from Polish, means ‘yokel’. You know what a ‘yokel’ is, right? If you do not, let’s hear what Wikipedia says:

Yokel is a derogatory term referring to the stereotype of unsophisticated country people.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yokel

This could perhaps explain Anna’s stupidity. Remember, she could not comprehend the simple, very easily verifiable fact, that she was visiting a web page that was put together with the aim to destroy the ‘Holocaust’ myth. A yokel, indeed!
At any rate, here is the message she sent to me via my (defunct) web page in 2006:
auschwitz-jewish-center-foundation02_k0nsl

Text:

Hello,
I work for a Holocaust education non-profit. We are interested in adding a blog to our website so that visitors to our Center outside Auschwitz-Birkenau can post comments about their visit and also go there to learn about the Lecture series we offer, etc. My question is this, how do screen people who comment to protect against anti-semites and generally unfriendly thoughts people might leave. Any adivice you could give would be most helpful.
Regards,
Anna Thomas
Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation

Answer:

Dear Anna Thomas!

I should like to ask a couple of questions myself before we continue.
The following questions are not intended to be unfriendly or
disrespectful in any way or shape.

Can you please define, in your own view, in what way your Holocaust
education organisation may help human understanding, evolution and the
process of learning? What will humankind benefit from being educated
with the Holocaust?

Can you specifically describe, in vivid detail, what your Lectures
offer in terms of understanding the Holocaust? What do these lectures
contain that we must know? What areas of the Holocaust do these
lectures cover? In your own view; what do you find compelling about
these lectures that you think other people must know of?

Why do you believe it to be necessary to protect from anti-Semites and
generally unfriendly thoughts which people may have? What is a
anti-Semite in your own definition and view? What could these
unfriendly thoughts be which you are afraid people might have?

I may have further questions, soon. In the meantime I thought we could
discuss the blog matter which you wanted advice about. I can’t say
that I believe my website is a ‘blog’, although it is listed in many
blog directories across the Internet. I see it more as a news archive,
that is essentially the only purpose of it. It was intended to
be a portal of information, easily accessible by anybody who is
interested in the Holocaust.
It is based upon the source of AJ-F and heavily modified by myself
because the original code was very unstable and insecure and could be
exploited very easily unless changes were made. Today the code looks
nothing like that of the original and is essentially a new application
with little or no resemblance to the original code. I did all these
changes by myself and with the permission of the author of the
original code.

Subsequently, my honest suggestion would be for you to learn how to write in the
PHP language. Once complete you will have the feeling of having
accomplished something, rather than using the work of somebody else,
which I would imagine would leave a bitter taste in the mouth. That
is the way I feel about it. I prefer to accomplish things on my own, without
the help of anybody else. There are many positive things of this to be
sure. If you wrote something entirely on your own, you would not have
to rely on somebody else to fix a problem in the code, or having to
rely on somebody when something unexpected happens. You would just fix
the corresponding error yourself. I can assure you that it is very
gratifying.

Thank you for contacting me. I will look forward to hear from you again.

Hi Ho Cherry-O,
-Franz Holtzhäuser, Holocaust History Archive and News portal.

Anna replies back

Franz,

Sorry for the misunderstanding, thanks for taking the time to write me back,
and the adivce about the code.

Anna

Anna W. Thomas
Director of Operations
Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation
36 W. 44th Street, Suite 1208
New York, New York 10036
(p) 212.575.1050
(f) 212.575.1051

She must have felt like a real chooch when she finally realized that she had contacted a ‘notorious holocaust denier’ for servicing their hate site (hey, lighten up – that’s essentially what it is, they’re knowingly putting out horrendous lies against the German people).
Anyway, just a little something from the archives

Addendum

Here are the raw / complete email headers for when she sent me a message from her actual e-mail account ‘athomas@ajcf.org’:
auschwitz-jewish-center-foundation03_k0nsl

3

The Awaited Debunking of Holocaust Controversies

holocaustcontroversies-eviscerated01_k0nsl

Holocaust Controversies Holocaust Controversies


I found this announcement via Charles Traynor at RODOH, but I did get the news item already in my mailbox this morning and I instantly shared it with my friends. I will re-post the announcement on my blog.
The early version of this work — which I engulfed several months ago — counted some 1480 pages, not counting the appendix. So enjoy, friends!

The long awaited revisionist rebuttal of the HC crews Operation Reinhard White Paper has just been released.

In late 2011, several members of the exterminationist Holocaust Controversies blog published a 570 page-long online study titled Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka: Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard. With it they claim to refute three revisionist monographs on these three alleged extermination camps.

This lengthy orthodox critique has forced the criticized revisionist authors to get back to the drawing board. Finally, after 20 months of arduous work by both the authors and the peer reviewers and editors involved, the results has finally been released to the public as a 1554 pages long PDF file!

This work has occupied the most knowledgeable revisionists for a year and more. It has led to the postponement of numerous other projects, including a number of other books of the Holocaust Handbooks series slated for publication. Today’s leading revisionists consider this their ultimate response and final word on the subject. (And we all should hope so, because what would be next: a study comprising 5,000 pages?)

This definitive revisionist work on the alleged extermination camps of the so-called “Aktion Reinhardt” reveals in hundreds of cases that the Holocaust Controversies bloggers have plagiarized many sources and that many, if not most of their factual claims are mere conjectures, distortions, falsifications, hypocrisies, lies, misrepresentations, unfounded speculations, and blatant omissions of facts.

You can read more about this book here at CODOH – AND you can download this gargantuan work there as well – for free, of course, as usual.

Source: http://codoh.com/library/document/3052
Read the actual rebuttal in PDF: http://codoh.com/sites/default/files/downloads/28-tecoar-long.pdf
Discussion: http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8145

It is game over for the ‘intellectual midgets’, that’s to say: Harrison, Muehlenkamp, Myers, Romanov and Terry

2

Raul Hilberg Demolished In Court

raul-hilberg02_k0nsl

The late Raul Hilberg was one of the best-known and most distinguished of Holocaust historians — he met a terrible fate in court when he tried to defend his Holocaust ideology. I am of the opinion that it would have been much better for Mr. Hilberg if he should’ve stayed with his hobby of train spotting rather than promoting senseless hatred and lies against Europeans, in particular against the Germans.

Gist

In the first part of this clip defense lawyer Douglas Christie demolishes “Holocaust” expert Raul Hilberg on the stand. Then defense witnesses Prof. Robert Faurisson, Dr. Russell Barton, Dr. William Lindsey and Thies Christophersen give their views on the “Holocaust” myth. Particularly significant is Dr. Barton’s testimony: as an eyewitness at Bergen-Belsen he states categorically that the deaths at that camp were not due to a deliberate policy of extermination regardless of false commentary over photographs and film depicting stacked corpses. In the last part the Jewish Defense League is in hysterics outside court. Debate the Holocaust? Truth is no defense in sovietized Canada.

Download

Raul-Hilberg-Demolished-In-Court_k0nsl.flv (right-click, then “Save As”)

Raul_Hilberg_Demolished_In_Court01_k0nsl.mp4 (right-click, then “Save As”)