0

The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth

majdanek-bad-und-disinfektion01_k0nsl

majdanekposter01_k0nsl

Information

Genre: Documentary

Title: The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth

Author: Eric Hunt

THE MAJDANEK GAS CHAMBER MYTH debunks the “Gas Chambers Disguised as Shower Rooms” propaganda coup.

Majdanek was the first major concentration camp liberated by the victorious Allies. Upon capture by the Soviet Union, original propaganda claimed that 2 million were murdered in a “factory of death” which included seven homicidal gas chambers.

However, Majdanek was captured largely intact and a large amount of documentation and physical evidence helps to acquit the Germans of the “Gas Chambers disguised as shower rooms” blood libel.

The original, outrageously inflated propaganda death toll has precipitously dropped, and 5 of the 7 originally alleged “homicidal gas chambers” have been admitted to never have served as homicidal gas chambers.

“The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth” demolishes the Holocaust exterminationist “Gas Chambers Disguised as Shower Rooms” propaganda hoax and shows how Majdanek is a microcosm of the larger Holocaust Hoax.

Watch THE MAJDANEK GAS CHAMBER MYTH, a new documentary from the filmmaker of THE LAST DAYS OF THE BIG LIE and THE TREBLINKA ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX.

http://www.holocausthoaxmuseum.com

Watch it!

Embed

VideoJS plugin: https://paste.jew.fail/?1e3756a900a32f47#G2pWp2GfXN3xZZvcvPAsvD/i+tZEovdYxrvaxtgtatY=

HTML5 Video: https://paste.jew.fail/?e4063e69e266b027#iSuTCKJ/CZvzU3EhbOyVoRwHj8CiixtcactDHrokSr8=

YouTube:

<iframe width="650" height="500" src="//www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/2R6mTTrOlzE?rel=0&amp;showinfo=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Mirrors

See this URL: http://eh.mirror.k0nsl.org/

0

Books in the Mail: TRR & LOTH

TRR-LOTH03
Two essential books Two essential books

I received a couple of very interesting books today in the mail; the mail man came honking his horn and I ran outside in anticipation for what I knew was already coming…

And there they were! A copy of the groundbreaking and legendary “Rudolf Report” together with the best starter book on the whole topic: “Lectures on the Holocaust—Controversial Issues Cross Examined”.

As I opened the package I was happy to see that both of the books survived the ordeal of the postal service, having received a big gushing hole in the package, which was big enough to reveal the contents therein. The books themselves weren’t damaged.

What of the contents? Here they are, signed and dedicated by Germar. I withheld my name for my own safety:

I have included the basic information for each book in the sections below. I would recommend buying the hardcover version of each book and to display them proudly in your bookshelf — one day these books will be very sought after items, the day when “The Big H” has totally collapsed. It already has been scientifically and academically refuted. The narrative has been destroyed. However, the general populace, overall, hasn’t received notice about it because they are inundated with daily lies via the media and all the institutions who promote the discredited ‘holocaust’ story.

I think both of these books are a “must have” for anybody interested in the topic, or for those who are simply curious to know more about it. Be open minded and read the material.

The Rudolf Report

In 1988, Fred Leuchter, American expert for execution technologies, investigated the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz and Majdanek and concluded that they could not have functioned as claimed. Ever since, Leuchter’s claims have been attacked. In 1993, Rudolf, a researcher from the prestigious Max Planck Institute, published a thorough forensic study about the “gas chambers” of Auschwitz. His report irons out the deficiencies and discrepancies of “The Leuchter Report.” The Rudolf Report was the first English edition of this sensational scientific work. This new edition analyzes all existing evidence on the Auschwitz gas chambers and offers even more evidence. The conclusions are startling. Appendix describes Rudolf’s unique persecution—this brilliant scientist was so feared by the mainstream holocaust establishment that they banned him from writing about or researching the subject as terms of his release from prison!

Here’s what several scholars had to say about this book:

“I am extraordinarily impressed. To my knowledge, you are the first expert in Germany who has addressed this particular topic in a scholarly impeccable and well-founded way. It is not for me to attribute an ice-breaker function to your expert report. It is easy to see which political-historical effects will originate from it, though its entire dimension cannot yet be estimated.” —Prof. Dr. Hellmut Diwald, Historian, January 22, 1992

“I read it with great interest. […] My impression is, however, that this expert report is an important contribution to a very important question which, since the ‘Leuchter Report,’ needs to be answered urgently. […] One can only very much hope that the well-known tactics of hushing up is not applied to your expert report, but that critical responses and comments will be made.” —Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte, Historian, January 28, 1992

“For me, the significance of receiving your report rests on the fact that it substantially contributes to our stock of knowledge. With many of my collegues active in the field of contemporary history, I am overjoyed and thankful for you having initiated this research activity. Of course, I am even more delighted regarding the results of your accurate scientific investigation.” —Prof. Dr. Werner Georg Haverbeck, Historian, January 31, 1992

“I calmly read your report! It gives me hope to realize that a representative of the younger generation courageously sets out, with scientific thoroughness, noticeable great expertise, and corresponding investigative curiosity, to get to the bottom of a controversial question that is of worldwide significance! The result is clear and unequivocal! True facts cannot be suppressed forever! I wish that your work will make the breakthrough!” —Prof. Emil Schlee, Historian, April 1, 1992

“[…] I sincerely hope that all statements about this topic would obviously be based on long and intensive work such as yours. Most of it is certainly unverifiable for the layman, but the photographs are already quite informative. […]” —Prof. Dr. Ernst Nolte, Historian, January 6, 1993

“Rudolf is a young scientist who tried to prove in an excellently layed-out work with tables, graphics, and so on, that the gas chambers were technically impossible. […] These scientific analyses are perfect.” —Hans Westra, Anne-Frank-Foundation, BRT 1 TV (Belgium), Panorama, April 27, 1995

“All in all, he relies on literature which was written long before this report was completed, and the report must be described as scientifically acceptable.” —Prof. Dr. Henri Ramuz, Chemist, interrogated as expert witness about the Rudolf Report by the Swiss Court at Châtel-St.-Denis, May 18, 1997

Lectures on the Holocaust

In 1976, Holocaust revisionism produced its last “standard work,” if there ever was such a thing: A.R. Butz’ Hoax of the Twentieth Century. “How can a quarter century old text not be obsolete today?” Butz asks in the preface of the 2003 edition of his own book, pointing out “the age of this text, and the great advances that have subsequently occurred in Holocaust revisionism.” Hence, there is a great need for a new, integrated work summarizing Holocaust revisionism after 30 years of very intensive and thorough research.

And here it is, the new standard work of Holocaust revisionism! It was written by German scholar, writer, and publisher Germar Rudolf, based on the research of the most prominent revisionists, most of which Rudolf had the pleasure to publish in a multitude of German and English language journal articles and books over the past 15 years.

The book was written to fit the need of both those who have no in-depth knowledge of the Holocaust or of revisionism, as well as for well-versed readers familiar with revisionism. Anyone who wants to bring himself up to date on revisionist scholarship, but does not want to read all the special studies that were published during the past ten years, needs this book!

Since 1992, Rudolf has been giving lectures to various mainstream audiences all over the world. His topic is very controversial: the Holocaust in the light of new forensic and historical findings. Rudolf’s sometimes astounding facts and arguments fall on fertile soil among his listeners, as they are presented in a very sensitive and scholarly way. This book is the literary version of Rudolf’s lectures, enriched with the most recent findings of historiography.

The book’s style is unique: It is a dialogue between the lecturer and the reactions of the audience. Rudolf introduces the most important arguments and counter arguments of Holocaust revisionism. The audience reacts with supportive, skeptical, and also hostile questions. The Lectures read like an exciting real-life exchange between persons of various points of view. The usual moral, political, and pseudo-scientific arguments against revisionism are addressed and refuted. This book resembles an entertaining collection of answers to frequently asked questions on the Holocaust. With generous references to a vast bibliography, this easy-to-understand book is the best introduction into this taboo topic for both readers unfamiliar with the topic and for those wanting to know more.

0

The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax

treblinka-archaeology-hoax01_k0nsl

Were 900,000 Jews “gassed” at Treblinka?

Were 3.9 Million “Steamed to Death” in “steam chambers” there too, as according to Nuremberg trial “evidence”?

The official “Holocaust” story is that Treblinka II is the largest mass burial site in the entire world, where the Germans gassed 900,000 Jews in 13 “gas chambers disguised as shower rooms.”

“Holocaust Deniers” or “Holocaust Revisionists” claim there’s no evidence for that, and tales of “gas chambers disguised as shower rooms” stories are wartime atrocity fiction, similar to previously debunked claims about Jews being made into soap and lampshades.

The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax debunks Zionist British Archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls’ fraudulent “investigation” of Treblinka, which included digging near clearly marked Christian graves claiming to find new “hidden mass graves”, falsely assigning homicidal intent to a normal life-saving shower room at Majdanek, and misidentifying a terra-cotta tile excavated at Treblinka as belonging to the floor of a homicidal “gas chamber.”

Free yourself from a lifetime of brainwashing about “Six Million” Jews “gassed” in “Gas Chambers Disguised as Shower Rooms”-

Watch it!

Available in Full HD

never-used-as-a-death-camp01_k0nsl

http://gaschamberhoax.com

Download

Both of Eric Hunt’s recent documentaries are mirrored at k0nsl.org and can be freely downloaded:

http://gaschamberhoax.mirror.k0nsl.org/

1

Andrew E. Mathis: “Get with the f*cking program.”

2thCenturyHoax01_k0nsl

Andrew E. Mathis is at it again, making a complete fool out of himself. Why doesn’t that man think before he opens his mouth? How embarrassing it must be for him

Andy wrote this as a comment to the embedded video above:

Here’s something I wrote seven ago. When are you people going to get with the fucking program?

“Auschwitz and Majdanek also had large labor division [sic], and even Treblinka seems to have occasionally served as a transit camp for small numbers of Jews fit for labor, sent from there to Majdanek concentration camp.”

I posted that at HC blog on December 26, 2006. Why doesn’t Denierbud read his critics?

One more thing: Why not give us some interviews with Belzec survivors or Chelmno survivors? Certainly if these were transit camps, there would be as many survivors of these camps as of Treblinka and Sobibor, right?

The producer (Mr. Hunt) replied to Andrew E. Mathis with the following comment:

This video is not concerning 2006, or denierbud for that matter. You need to get new canned responses because the evidence of thousands upon thousands of Jewish men women and children being transited to camps in Lublin as well as Auschwitz is a game changer. “Pure extermination camp” is bullshit. Transit camp is reality.

As the information age advances, exterminationists will no longer be able to go back to the 2006 status quo of it being near-impossible to find Treblinka transitees.

Some of us are going to push through the imprisonment and persecution and continue to research the subject.

Not like a Treblinka rest stop of a few hours on the way to another camp is memorable in the grand scheme of the war. As we’ve seen, in this video most didn’t see anything but a Polish field with flowers and birds chirping. Who cares to remark about a rest stop at Treblinka when they were abused in other camps or almost froze to death elsewhwere? One of the reasons there isn’t a flood of Treblinka talk is that it wasn’t a memorable place.

After all, why hasn’t Zisblatt talked about it more? She’s on the Mead registry of Treblinka survivors, and she was coming from the East of Treblinka to Auschwitz. She apparently stopped at Treblinka.

So another fact is suppression of this evidence. Arad and Peter Black ignore known documentation about Treblinka transports to Majdanek which isn’t even in dispute in order to shape their false narrative.

I’m going to continue to release even MORE information about entire transports of men, women, and children (totally worthless for labor) transited through the “pure extermination camp” Treblinka.

If given access to the same archives Arad, the Holocaust Museums of the World, I can easily trace many more transports FULL of Jewish men, women and children transited through Treblinka (just like I already did.)

You would think “absolute” Arad would admit his mistake and actually give Revisionists that very opportunity!

But I don’t necessarily need that opportunity. When one approaches the “Where did they go?” question and actually tries to trace these Jews (such as I did for the February 14th transport) instead of believing in the gas chamber monster it’s a foregone conclusion that more and more Treblinka transitees and entire transports will be found and traced.

Of course along with Sobibor and Belzec, which were transit camps similar to Treblinka on a smaller scale. There are many Sobibor and Belzec transitees too, of course, but I focused on Treblinka because it’s the big domino.

The Communist professor Mathis NEEDS gassed Jews to support his genocidal ideology. His profile photo of the Soviet flag over a decimated Germany clearly represents the lack of freedom and human decency Communists like him have to offer the world.

Communist exterminationists like Mathis love the gassed Jews lie because it lets them whitewash the Communist regime’s actual atrocities and murder camps.

But there’s no Shoah Foundation for 50,000 whining, lying Ukrainian Holodomor victims – because they’re dead!

Andrew E. Mathis replies with a threat:

For fuck’s sake, Eric, did two years in prison and another four on parole not do anything for you? Speaking of which, your parole was up in, when? August 2012? Did I hear something about your being barred from your “political” activities while that parole was still on? But you were interviewed by Carolyn Yeager in 2011. Hmmmm.

I’d advise you to be very, very nice to me, Eric.

Download this documentary

Please visit gaschamberhoax.com to download it.

8

Symphony of Science – A Wave of Reason

agitated-holocaust-believers-no-reason-no-logic01_k0nsl

I was just merrily hopping around on YouTube to find anything useful and somehow I stumbled upon the clip Symphony of Science – A Wave of Reason which I found to be OK, with only a few reservations. For example, why do they feature Michael Shermer in it? That guy is a fraud [1].

For example, I found a lot of useful information on him, at this forum:

http://forum.codoh.com/search.php?keywords=Shermer

Anyway. I was met with contempt and foul behaviour from ‘holocaust’ believers when I voiced my opinion, see:

agitated-holocaust-believers-no-reason-no-logic01_k0nsl

The first guy deleted his expletive commentary, probably realizing that his emotional outbreak would only confirm my point. The other guy, Mr. Graham McCann jumps in and is heavy on the emotional language, using such terminology as ‘Nazi death camps’ to bolster his already flawed argument, which is a mere non-sequitur.

Why do people such as Graham McCann perpetuate these infantile lies?

Notes

1. http://www.countercontempt.com/?s=Shermer

0

Anna Thomas of the Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation in 2006

auschwitz-jewish-center-foundation01_k0nsl

In 2006 I was contacted by Anna Thomas from the Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation (AJC) through my now defunct ‘Holocaust History Archive’ web page. For what reason, you ask? She requested my services.
I’m unable to find a profile on her or even a photograph. But I strongly suspect (on circumstantial evidence, I might add) that she is Anna Chłopek, a volunteer at the Auschwitz Jewish Center — very young, in her middle twenties, or some such, it is difficult to guess it. She could be close to my age. I cannot find any Anna Thomas from the AJC so this girl probably did the old ‘change the name trick’ when sending me the e-mail (which was sent from a contact form on my site); but despite her little trick, I’m almost convinced she’s Anna Chłopek. If she isn’t, then I’m sorry for the mistake. Perhaps one could call the Anna Thomas? Try 212.575.1050, that’s not a number in Poland, so perhaps I am wrong. What’s more, and this is the real hoot, her surname ‘Chłopek’, when translated into English from Polish, means ‘yokel’. You know what a ‘yokel’ is, right? If you do not, let’s hear what Wikipedia says:

Yokel is a derogatory term referring to the stereotype of unsophisticated country people.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yokel

This could perhaps explain Anna’s stupidity. Remember, she could not comprehend the simple, very easily verifiable fact, that she was visiting a web page that was put together with the aim to destroy the ‘Holocaust’ myth. A yokel, indeed!
At any rate, here is the message she sent to me via my (defunct) web page in 2006:
auschwitz-jewish-center-foundation02_k0nsl

Text:

Hello,
I work for a Holocaust education non-profit. We are interested in adding a blog to our website so that visitors to our Center outside Auschwitz-Birkenau can post comments about their visit and also go there to learn about the Lecture series we offer, etc. My question is this, how do screen people who comment to protect against anti-semites and generally unfriendly thoughts people might leave. Any adivice you could give would be most helpful.
Regards,
Anna Thomas
Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation

Answer:

Dear Anna Thomas!

I should like to ask a couple of questions myself before we continue.
The following questions are not intended to be unfriendly or
disrespectful in any way or shape.

Can you please define, in your own view, in what way your Holocaust
education organisation may help human understanding, evolution and the
process of learning? What will humankind benefit from being educated
with the Holocaust?

Can you specifically describe, in vivid detail, what your Lectures
offer in terms of understanding the Holocaust? What do these lectures
contain that we must know? What areas of the Holocaust do these
lectures cover? In your own view; what do you find compelling about
these lectures that you think other people must know of?

Why do you believe it to be necessary to protect from anti-Semites and
generally unfriendly thoughts which people may have? What is a
anti-Semite in your own definition and view? What could these
unfriendly thoughts be which you are afraid people might have?

I may have further questions, soon. In the meantime I thought we could
discuss the blog matter which you wanted advice about. I can’t say
that I believe my website is a ‘blog’, although it is listed in many
blog directories across the Internet. I see it more as a news archive,
that is essentially the only purpose of it. It was intended to
be a portal of information, easily accessible by anybody who is
interested in the Holocaust.
It is based upon the source of AJ-F and heavily modified by myself
because the original code was very unstable and insecure and could be
exploited very easily unless changes were made. Today the code looks
nothing like that of the original and is essentially a new application
with little or no resemblance to the original code. I did all these
changes by myself and with the permission of the author of the
original code.

Subsequently, my honest suggestion would be for you to learn how to write in the
PHP language. Once complete you will have the feeling of having
accomplished something, rather than using the work of somebody else,
which I would imagine would leave a bitter taste in the mouth. That
is the way I feel about it. I prefer to accomplish things on my own, without
the help of anybody else. There are many positive things of this to be
sure. If you wrote something entirely on your own, you would not have
to rely on somebody else to fix a problem in the code, or having to
rely on somebody when something unexpected happens. You would just fix
the corresponding error yourself. I can assure you that it is very
gratifying.

Thank you for contacting me. I will look forward to hear from you again.

Hi Ho Cherry-O,
-Franz Holtzhäuser, Holocaust History Archive and News portal.

Anna replies back

Franz,

Sorry for the misunderstanding, thanks for taking the time to write me back,
and the adivce about the code.

Anna

Anna W. Thomas
Director of Operations
Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation
36 W. 44th Street, Suite 1208
New York, New York 10036
(p) 212.575.1050
(f) 212.575.1051

She must have felt like a real chooch when she finally realized that she had contacted a ‘notorious holocaust denier’ for servicing their hate site (hey, lighten up – that’s essentially what it is, they’re knowingly putting out horrendous lies against the German people).
Anyway, just a little something from the archives

Addendum

Here are the raw / complete email headers for when she sent me a message from her actual e-mail account ‘athomas@ajcf.org’:
auschwitz-jewish-center-foundation03_k0nsl

0

Merkel: Germany can never be neutral on Israel

Merkel-Germany-can-never-be-neutral-on-Israel02_k0nsl

Merkel-Germany-can-never-be-neutral-on-Israel01_k0nsl

Commentary from k0nsl

So it is official, I suppose. Germany cannot and will not abandon the ‘holocaust’ fraud, and will give Israel all the support it needs. This little rogue state is currently engaged in genocidal actions against the Palestinians. Ironic, or isn’t it? A people who claims to have been victims of a ‘heinous crime’ is currently – at this very moment – practising genocide against another people. The chutzpah of these people is nothing but insanity, rooted in their mental state, dating back thousands of years.

When will it end? (that reminds me of the following song by DIJ)